Technical writing
This document provides an introduction to technical writing. It defines technical writing as writing that requires direction, instruction or explanation on a particular subject. The goals of technical writing are to deliver technical information to readers based on their needs and background, and to communicate with a specific audience for a specific purpose. Some key characteristics of effective technical writing are understanding the purpose and audience, providing accurate information clearly using efficient words and the proper writing style and punctuation. Read less
More Related Content
- 1. Introduction to Technical Writing Mutia Rachmawati Mindtalk: @apfelwein [email protected]
- 2. Definition Technical writing is a type of writing where the author is writing about a particular subject that requires direction, instruction, or explanation.
- 3. Goals •To deliver technical information for readers in a manner that is adapted to their needs, level of understanding, and background. •To communicate with specific audience, for a specific purpose.
- 4. Characteristics •Understanding what is the purpose and why you are writing. To inform? To instruct? To propose? To recommend? Or to persuade?
- 5. Characteristics •Writing for audience. Who is the audience? What is their background? What do they need?
- 6. Characteristics •Satisfying document specifications (Appropriate genre/type of document) What is the document type? How about the required format?
- 7. Characteristics •Providing accurate information. Technical writing document is not about opinion.
- 8. Characteristics •Expressing information clearly. No room for ambiguity!
- 9. Characteristics •Using efficient words.
- 10. Characteristics •Using appropriate writing style and the right punctuation marks. Be careful of typos, sentences in conversational tone, and punctuation problems!
- 11. Effective Technical Writing •Clarity •Conciseness •Accuracy •Organization •Process
- 12. Clarity •Specify. •Avoid obscure words. •Limit and/or define your use of abbreviations, acronyms, and jargon. •Use the active versus the passive voice.
- 13. Conciseness •Limit paragraph, word, and sentence length. •Proofread for accuracy •Avoid redundancies
- 14. Accuracy •The importance of correct grammar.
- 15. Organization •Methods for organizing – Definition – Comparison/Contrast – More Important to Less Important – Situation-Problem-Solution-Evaluation – Cause-Effect
- 16. Process All that you need to do is three things: – Prewrite (about 25 percent of your time) – Write (about 25 percent of your time) – Rewrite (about 50 percent of your time)
- 17. References Biosystems Engineering. Technical Writing Guide version 2.0. Michigan State University. September. 2007. <https://www.msu.edu/course/be/485/bewritingguideV2.0.pdf> Kelley, Nicole. Sentence Structure of Technical Writing. Fall. 2006. <http://web.mit.edu/me- ugoffice/communication/technical-writing.pdf>
Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.
4.6 Presentations
Presentations are an interesting genre, since they can cover a variety of genres and purposes. Presentations provide the opportunity to present information in a multimodal format, and often require you to condense information for a broad audience. Within the very broad genre of “presentation” many genres fall with more specific conventions and constraints. Some examples include:
- Conference presentations
- Less formal meeting or business presentations (internal)
As technology continues to develop, you might consider other genres under the umbrella of “presentations,” including:
- Youtube videos
In this section, we talk about the specific genre of presentations, but we also focus on taking complex information (such as gathered in a formal report) and reworking, condensing, and remixing that information into a presentation, a website, a poster or infographic, or a podcast.
Diversity, equity, and inclusion
Just like with the other common genres that we’ve discussed so far, presentations are developed for a specific audience. So, you need to consider how your audience might best receive the information that you are working to communicate. Presentations are a great way to reach an audience, and as a communicator you get to explore various communication modes and approaches. As with anything else, what might work for one audience would not work for another audience; think back to the different ways to communicate the process of conducting a Covid-19 nasal test. Each example was effective, but only in the context of their intended audience.
Technical presentations are a specific genre that often take the complex, lengthy information included in a formal report and condenses and translates that information in a way that includes visual and audio communication modes. Consider why it is useful to present information in various ways (as a formal report and as a 5-10 minute presentation). How might presenting information in various ways or formats increase accessibility? How might developing a presentation work towards equity of information access?
When creating a presentation, the principles of universal design are important things to keep in mind. One example might be adding captions if you create a presentation that has any audio component. The captions are essential for any audience members who are hearing impaired, AND they make it easier to absorb content and understand the audio for your entire audience. Remember that universal design means that accessibility of information is an essential part of your presentation: do not think about accessibility after you’ve created your content, but work it in from the beginning and throughout your process.
Technical presentations
Technical presentations can vary quite a bit in length and content, depending on your purpose, audience, and context (remember that the rhetorical situation is always relevant!). Generally speaking, a technical presentation will:
- Condense a longer text, such as a formal report
- Summarize the most important, useful, or meaningful information from that text
- Use visuals, text, and audio together in order to tell a story
Most often, presentations work to inform, to persuade, or both. All the things that we’ve discussed so far are important to consider when you create a presentation, including plain language, document design, and considering diversity, equity, and inclusion. Just as with any other genre, to create an effective presentation, you must understand your audience.
Google Slides
These are only 3 of many free tutorials available online.
When creating effective presentation slides, be sure that you balance the amount of information on each slide. Consider how your audience is interacting with these slides: they are not likely sitting down with so much time to carefully read through each one. Rather, they may only have a minute to take in all the content. So, less is often better than putting too much text on any one slide. It’s also important to use a variety of visual modes–such as graphics and images–along with text.
The text that you choose should summarize key points, and the images should reinforce or illustrate those points. Do not make your audience take in large blocks of text. Instead, summarize key questions, data points, findings, and conclusions. Show them examples that help to illustrate these important points, but do not overwhelm them. You cannot include everything in a presentation that you would include in a lengthy report. Rather, you must choose the most important pieces so that your audience has a clear idea of what you want them to take away from your project.
When planning and creating audio, be sure that you do not simply read the text from our slides. Instead, you can use the audio portion of your presentation to further explain key concepts. Give your reader a bit more detail, but do not overwhelm them. A presentation works to create a narrative or tell a story. The audio and text should complement each other, but not be exactly the same (if you’ve ever attended a presentation where the presenter read each slide out loud, you know how uninteresting that can be!).
Finally, consider accessibility when you design your presentation. Create closed captions or subtitles when recording audio, and be sure to incorporate the principles of universal design. Try to imagine how to make information accessible to your audience in regards to your text, your use of language and terminology, your use of visuals and graphics, and your use of audio.
Message titles
On way to create stronger, more memorable presentations is through the use of message titles rather than subject titles for each slide. It’s important to use strong titles, and a message title delivers a full message to your reader. A subject title is briefer and less specific. An example of the difference between a message title and subject title might be:
Subject title:
Covid-19 prevention
Message title:
How can I protect myself from Covid-19?
A message title is generally more effective for audiences because it provides more information. Further, delivering a full message helps audiences to retain the information presented in that slide and it frames what you cover in that section of your presentation. Remember that audiences must listen to your presentation and read your slides at the same time. Subject titles provide information, but message titles helps audiences place that information into a more specific framework. A message title delivers your message in a more complete way.
Condensing and remixing
While most formal reports use some sort of presentation software and rely on a combination of slides (which contain visuals and text) and audio (which may be spoken live as you present to an audience or may be recorded ahead of time), there are other ways to remix and present information in a condensed and useful way. As technology develops, so does the presentation genre. For example, podcasts, videos, or websites might be useful in place of a technical presentation, again depending on the audience, purpose, and context.
If you are enrolled in WRIT 3562W, you are not asked to create a podcast or website; however, you may come across such genres and want to use them as sources in your own report. And, you will likely want to (or be asked to!) create a website or podcast someday. So how can you begin to take information presented in something like a formal report and revise, translate, and remix it for a completely different medium?
First, consider the rhetorical situation and reflect on your own experiences as a website user or a podcast listener. Which websites do you like best? Which podcasts do you enjoy? Then, do some reflection and analysis and consider the following questions:
- When interacting with a website, what features are most important to you? How are you typically interacting with content (do you want to be able to search for something specific, do you want something easy to skim, do you want to deeply read all the text, etc.)?
- Think of the easiest to navigate website you’ve visited recently; what specific features made it easy to navigate? How did it use text, images, alignment, repetition, contrast, colors, language to help you know how to find and understand information?
- Think of the most difficult to navigate website that you’ve ever visited; what made it difficult? What specific features can you identify or isolate that made it hard to find information?
- Consider your favorite podcast; how does the creator(s) organize the content and present information clearly? How long does it take to listen to? What environment do you usually listen to podcasts in (your car, at home, using headphones, on a speaker while you cook dinner…). What specific features can you identify or isolate that make it enjoyable?
These types of reflection questions help you to make decisions about the texts that you create. They are useful when considering conventions or strengths of specific genres, AND they are useful when you have to create a genre that is completely new to you. Remember that analyzing the rhetorical situation and genre conventions together make it manageable as you approach any new communication task.
Throughout this text, we’ve discussed technical communication as rhetorical, as always concerned with diversity, equity, and inclusion, how we define or set the boundaries for technical communication, and the conventions of common genres. As you continue your education and practice as a technical communicator, or as you approach any new communication situation, keep doing the work of analysis and reflection. Consider how each act of communication engages a specific audience for a specific purpose. Even the most seemingly objective genres require you to make choices: what information do you include, whose voices and experiences do you elevate, how do you take in feedback and revise your texts, how do you approach research in a way that reduces bias and incorporates marginalized experiences–these are all important pieces of the communication process. As technical communication continues to develop and evolve, and as technology and genres also change, keep these considerations in mind.
Activity and Reflection: Presenting information
Together or with a partner, find a presentation (you can search YouTube for technical presentations or Ted Talks). Reflect on the following questions to perform a rhetorical analysis on the presentation:
- Who is the target audience for this presentation? How can you tell?
- What is the main purpose or goal of the presentation? How can you tell?
- What did you like about the presentation (be specific)? What features make it effective?
- What would you change, and why?
- How does the presentation use text and audio together to deliver a message? How do these elements complement each other?
Introduction to Technical and Professional Communication Copyright © 2021 by Brigitte Mussack is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.
Share This Book
Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.
1 Introduction to Technical Writing
Week 1 Lecture
Hey associates, this lecture is about technical writing and presentation as a form of communication. It is an overview of our field, and this class, focused on STEM, professional, and business writing contexts. You can listen along to the podcast episode, which has the same content as this chapter ( you are currently reading a formatted transcript of the podcast lecture ).
The lecture has three sections:
- Technical Writing as a Discipline and the differences between that and essays or school writing you might be used to creating,
- the Styles of writing with a preview of the common genres,
I’ve provided a notetaking guide you can download to organize your thoughts and Big Actions–the “what will I do because of this information.” At the end of each section, you will see a blue box to stop at and check your notes as I recap big points.
Recap Sections
I will list the topics and key points you need notes on in these blue boxes. This box doesn’t replace reading the section; it is just a guide to help you check your notes.
- Try different styles of notetaking! You can doodle, make cartoons, create a slide deck, color code your points, and use interactive tools like OneNote (which allows making flashcards) or third parties. Don’t limit yourself to a bullet-point list–if you find that boring or ineffective. Take control of your learning and make it more engaging, creative, and useful.
I recommend stopping and returning another time to stay fresh and focused after reach section. These are full lectures meant to replace or be equivalent to sitting in class for a full period. But unlike sitting in a lecture hall, where you have to focus the whole time, you get to pause, rewind, leave, and return to the information on your own time. Use that control intentionally to break up the information over the whole week and stay focused in smaller chunks. Asking your brain to stop and re-engage with concepts multiple times over the week, which naturally leads to revisiting past notes and thinking about where you are at, is a sneaky study strategy that helps process information. Don’t power through and half-listen in one sitting. Do what you want, but also set yourself up for more success.
Section 1: Technical Writing as a Discipline
First things first: this class for the technical and business context of writing is a whole different category than ESSAYS. You are NOT writing essays for any project or situation in this course. Each has its purpose, place, and use. Essays show the reader how much you know, understand, think, and even argue about a topic. They are super efficient ways for a teacher to see how much you take in from a lesson, which is why they are so common in school. But in this class, I’m not grading or judging how well you know a specific topic; I’m looking for how well you demonstrate our strategies of writing styles, genres, and STEM situations.
The difference between essay writing and technical writing is apparent in three ways (✨write these things down!)
- ✨The goals of the work. Essays are writer-focused because your audience is interested in understanding how well YOU know the material with your thoughts, experience, analysis, and interpretations. The audience in technical writing expects reader-focused work because they want to accomplish their goals with content that serves their needs. So, often, essays are what YOU want to say, while technical writing is what the reader NEEDS for their work and tasks. The better you align the project with the situation I provide–it will be a CAMP site, which stands for the context, audience, message, and product–the stronger your score will be as you reflect consideration for the readers.
- ✨The way it is read. Essays are primarily narrative, meaning each sentence and section builds on the previous more or less sequentially. We expect the audience to read all your words in the order written to follow your train of thought and commentary. They aren’t constructed to skip around as much. In technical writing, the audience usually skips around to find content and often consumes a fraction of all the information available. We construct all of our documents and products in a tech writing situation with the mindset that they might read it in order–and it certainly makes the MOST sense and value if they do–but that, realistically, they will and can pop around. So, we do need to recap really important elements and format them in specific ways that allow for that pattern.
- ✨This leads to the most visible difference because of the purpose and audience distinctions: How documents are formatted. Essays are typically written as paragraphs of text because we expect the audience to read them all through. You might have a few major headings, but the transitions into your new ideas mostly exist inside of the writing and rely on your sentence and paragraph construction. In an essay, “formatting” mainly refers to margins, font styling, line spacing, and other type-focused elements. Technical writing is designed for readers to skip information, scan pages for context, and skim with quick processing. We use far more headings, symbols, boxes, and graphics to guide the reader. When we talk about formatting it is a deeper “ document design ” or “information design” strategy that presents the information to the reader. We use all those tools to create a path or guide for the reader to make it easier, faster, and clearer for them to search for the topics.
Overall, when creating a technical document, we need to make it easy to skip, scan, and skim . People don’t super want to read your stuff: they have to because there is a specific job, goal, or actionable information that they need. Their patience is typically thinner than most other audiences–think of your favorite book…it is just words and words, but you actually WANT to read what happens to your characters. Think of an essay in the New Yorker or an Op-Ed in a paper…people read those because they want to; otherwise, they just skip it. And your professors who ask for an essay want to know how much you understand and interpret the unit they taught. But when we get an email, a manual, or a technical research paper….we usually read it for very specific information, instruction, and action.
So, big picture–you aren’t writing essays. So then…what are you writing, and what qualities and foundations do our technical writing genres show?
1.1 Qualities of Technical Writing
I will use the term ‘writing’ throughout the lectures, so we do need to stop and define or recognize what we mean. Writing or a document and text refers to any product we create for technical communication—so all these ‘writing’ concepts can be applied to our growing multi-media landscape. Often, technical writers are creating videos, podcasts, social media posts, infographics, posters….. Things that are beyond the typical writing you might picture. It is easier and faster to say ‘writing’ or ‘document’ than to list all those contexts every time.
So–and write this down in your notes– Technical Writing and Presentation means producing any form of user-focused, action-oriented communication, including print, digital, interactive, and audio/visual material created for STEM, Business, and Workplace contexts.
When we think about the ‘presentation’ of information… it can mean standing up in front of people and speaking a form of presentation, yeah, but I’m referring to the overall delivery of your information. How you present it on the page, the slide deck, and the screen. When you write a progress report, you present information to the reader.
With those definition items out of the way, we can turn to the key characteristics of all technical writing. I have three words I want you to remember for your work:
- ✨ Useful: Most people don’t want to read what we make. Instead, they’re reading it because they need to. So our work has to offer value to them. We maximize the value by addressing particular readers—while anyone or everyone COULD access the content, we aren’t designing it for ‘everyone’ (which then makes it less useful to anyone). Instead, we are comfortable and strongly saying this version of the document is for this target audience, who will find it the most useful. Our products also need to solve problems and offer information that the reader can act on. For something to be useful, it must be correct, accurate, and understandable. So we do need to adjust how we explain the topic to fit the reader. Even in this course–which is an introduction to these topics–I will simplify and make decisions on how detailed and specific, and nitpicky I get when delivering information: I focus on remaining correct while trying to keep it more useful to your broader careers, interests, and skill levels.
Sure, it might be the most correct or accurate to give a 10-page deep dive filled with all the most technical terms and tiny details of how ‘lift’ is achieved in an aircraft…and the engineers, mechanics, and safety inspectors might require that level of detailed accuracy. But if you are writing to the customers of your airline who are interested in how flight happens and worried about safety after a malfunction or recent crash, it is also CORRECT and more useful to simplify the physics into core points with relatable explanations.
- ✨Useable : As your notes should already outline, our audiences must skip, scan, and skim the content to find the answer. So, useability refers to the readability and control of the document. We want to give readers the tools–through our headings, symbols, graphics, navigation, labels, captions, callouts, and so many more options that we will get into this semester–to control their experience. The useability also considers the environment in which they will use it. Finally, useable refers to our legal and ethical responsibility to accessibility–ensuring that users with diverse physical and psychological needs can use the content–considering how those with disabilities or less-typical situations can interact with your content.
A field tech out in the rain, wind, and dirt might need a physically printed and laminated version of the manual to be useable compared to someone always in the office accessing content on a computer with internet and speakers. Giving the field techs a video tutorial would be less useable if they can’t hear it over the wind, can’t see it as well due to sun contrast, and maybe can’t play it without service or Wifi. And the office user might find a printed copy less useable when all their other work is saved on their computer, and they can listen to or follow along with video while they troubleshoot.
- Effective documents will make a good impression: They will be readable, organized, and neat. Being readable, organized, and neat means that our audiences can jump around our documents to find the information they need in that moment to make a decision and take action.
- Effective documents will make sense to the reader: To create things that make sense, we need to have a clear purpose and a clear plan for our document to get it to that purpose. Planning helps create a logical order, layout, and design. When people don’t understand the purpose of a document, they tend to enjoy the experience less.
As you move forward with your technical writing, repeat those words like a chant: useful, useable, enjoyable . Useful, useable, enjoyable. Make it useful, useable, enjoyable.
1.2 Visual Strategy
We use a full ‘visual strategy’ to help achieve our goals of useful, useable, enjoyable documents. The visual strategy is the entire visual impact of our document. It is not just about making a document look pretty; it is the strategy–the intentional plan–to help readers use, process, and remember the information presented. We will get way deeper into these principles in the Design Lecture, so as an overview, keep in mind these core principles that are a foundation of Technical Writing:
- ✨ Contrast is a design principle that makes different elements visually distinct. This can be achieved through various techniques, such as using different colors, fonts, sizes, or shapes.
For example, a heading might be made to stand out from the body text by using a larger font size or a bolder weight. Another example of contrast is the use of a red and bold “Danger” note in a manual to draw attention to important safety information that is different from the steps.
- ✨ Repetition is a design principle that uses the same elements multiple times to create a sense of unity and a pattern. This can be achieved through repeated colors, fonts, or shapes, as well as with the structure.
For example, main headings might always use the same font and size so the reader sees the pattern for big topics, or a symbol might be repeated to indicate a glossary term in each section. We also create a pattern for the reader by starting each section with an overview and ending each section with action items (or whatever content structure makes sense for that situation). Humans like order and we do tend to seek out, understand, and remember consistency better.
- ✨ Alignment is a design principle that refers to the arrangement of elements on the vertical and horizontal planes. It can create a sense of order and balance–again, people tend to enjoy and understand patterns and consistency better.
For example, in a bulleted list, the indenting along the horizontal alignment tells us that the bullet point is a sub-point. Or placing the content on a product page within a vertical column–the image, title, description, and price all aligned makes it easier to recognize and navigate the page.
- ✨ Proximity is a design principle that refers to the relationship between elements in terms of their distance from each other. It can be used to create a sense of grouping and hierarchy.
For example, putting the caption right below the image helps us understand that it is describing that image and not something else. Proximity and alignment work very closely together to help show that organization of the page.
- ✨ Size is a design principle that refers to the relative size of elements. It can be used to create a sense of importance or hierarchy.
For example, a larger element is typically considered more important or first in the information set. Our eyes just are drawn to very big and potentially very small things as they stand out in the layout. Size also heavily impacts the usability of a document.
All of these principles are happening on your page whether you design it that way or not. Repetition–or lack thereof–happens, and people look for it. Alignment and proximity exist based on how things are laid out. Size is impacting your content. So, the goal isn’t to ‘create’ alignment. The goal here is to strategize and USE the principles with intention and to work harder for your content. Control the contrast, repetition, alignment, proximity, and size of all the elements on your page through active decision-making.
We’ve reached our first recap! Please review your notes and ensure you have definitions, key points, and examples for the following topics. Your notes should make sense to YOU with descriptions and applications for your life. Don’t just write down what I said word for word necessarily–tweak it and come up with examples that make sense in your brain and connect to your career goals, hobbies, personal interests, and lives. That connection is where learning and understanding something happens. Not necessarily just from recall or copying.
Your notes should have content for the following:
- The difference between technical writing and essays. Your notes should talk about three specific things related to purpose, audience, and format.
- The definition of technical writing and presentation for this course.
- The qualities of technical writing. You should have written three specific terms with examples of how a document follows these three words.
- The definition of a visual strategy with 5 main principles to use intentionally and control in your work.
We’ve concluded Section 1 on Technical Writing as a Discipline for this lecture. I encourage you to take a LONG break before starting section 2. You should do something—eat, go to class, move your body, or go to sleep–and return when you are ready to refocus. 🎶🎶🎶
Section 2: Styles of Technical Writing
We are starting section 2 of this lecture on Technical Writing Genres as an Overview. The rhetorical situation—basically, the who, what, when, where, and why of your reason for writing—drives every decision we make as technical writers.
2.1 Ways to Present Information
We have four main ways to explain and describe topics for technical audiences. A document tends to fall within or mix 1 or 2 categories–but they aren’t necessarily exclusive. We can also talk about the same content in one way for one audience and then use that same topic differently for a different audience. These four ways: scholarly, functional, interpretive, and affective also don’t rely on the medium. We can have super scholarly YouTube videos just as we can write a lengthy report interpretively.
So, I’m going to define and explain the ways, and then, after, we will go through some examples.
This form of explanation focuses on the theoretical or academic components of the topic with heavy jargon. The scholarly presentation is really meant to be more useful, useable, and enjoyable for other informed, expert-level readers. It is a way of explaining things to people who need to REALLY, really know a topic, including all the history, influences, and little details. Since the reader of a scholarly presentation is expected to have a lot of prior knowledge and motivation for engaging with the work, we don’t necessarily stop to define every specialized term and will use that jargon as shortcuts that still keep the very niche in meaning.
Examples of scholarly presentation of topics would be academic research papers, which are written to explain and present data to other researchers. It will usually be very dense, with detailed sourcing for all the background, context, and outcomes.
✨Functional
This form of presentation focuses on the topic’s practical components using jargon. The functional description is meant for practitioners–people directly working with the subject who need to really understand how and why it works. They are expected to have prior knowledge and motivation to understand the topic, including familiarity with specialized terms.
Functional presentation is more common for trade journals written to explain industry topics to people working in the industry or things like proposals and documentation within a field. Your ReadMe files for code and technical descriptions for the devs and engineering teams are forms of functional work.
✨Interpretive
This form of description focuses on explaining the components using more general terms. It is like the more simplified version of the scholarly and the functional and meant for audiences who are just learning about a topic or only kind of need to know how and why things work. They don’t necessarily THE details to really KNOW, know the topic. They just need enough to understand the big principles and get the job done.
We would use the interpretive style or presentation for end-user documentation like user guide and tutorials where all the specialized terms are either avoided or defined and the reader learns more on how to use the product rather than why the product works in detail. A textbook for a class is also a good example of interpretive because it is usually a high-level introduction to the topic with plenty of definitions, examples, and simplified explanations to help you learn. Once you get through a textbook on the subject, it is easier to understand the more functional and scholarly documents.
The final form is focused on sharing an experience and really relating to the audience. It is the most easily understood by the widest audience type and is meant to create a connection, show the use-value, and generate interest in a topic. The audience is generally assumed to be a bit unmotivated or unsure how and why the topic is useful or related to them.
This style is most useful as a strategy inside of larger presentations–like stopping to explain how the product can be used or a solution is so valuable to fund. I do use an affective style during lectures and workshop activities when teaching as a way to introduce and help show the connections with our concepts to your careers or personal life. I like to tell stories from my own experience.
As an example, we can turn to NASA, which does a great job of explaining the same topics in different ways. So NASA has an entry in their Astrophysics Lab index for an AGN. They also have an Instagram post explaining an AGN. I’m going to read the excerpts, and I want you to listen for the differences in how the same concept is presented in a scholarly/functional way and a more interpretative/affective way:
The first excerpt–you can guess where this one is from and what style it is:
“For starters, an AGN is a small area in the center of some galaxies that is far brighter than the galaxy’s stars alone. The brightness is caused by a supermassive black hole heating matter that falls into it.”
Alright– now the second:
“Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) – An active galaxy contains a compact core, or nucleus, of emission that is embedded in an otherwise typical-looking galaxy. This galaxy nucleus shines at all wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum and is seen to be bright compared to the rest of the galaxy. Its light may also be highly variable, and some AGNs even change their major visual characteristics over time. In galaxies with very dense cores, the X-rays from the center can penetrate material outward from the nucleus, and this provides scientists with unique insights into the physical processes occurring there. Our science team performs X-ray observations and modeling of processes in these AGN systems. At the very center of an AGN lies a supermassive black hole. Dense material from the surrounding regions can accrete onto the black hole, releasing large amounts of gravitational energy.”
Did you guess which one was for the lab folks and which was for the Instagram audience? Probably. Here are the features that mark each presentation style:
- Level of Detail: Scholarly and functional presentations require more detail because the audience needs to understand what is going on. The specific details are less important for the interpretive audience. Both descriptions explain that AGNs are bright. The functional description gets into why they are bright–that it shines at all wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum. The interpretive presentation leaves it as it is far brighter –because they don’t necessarily need to know WHY or HOW…just that it is brighter.
- Components: Alongside the amount of detail is a change in how many factors, causes, and outcomes are included. Both explain how a supermassive black hole is a component of the AGN. But the functional description explains that X-rays observations and modeling is used to understand the features and that is how they know a blackhole exists.
- wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum vs. brighter than other stars
- gravitational energy vs. matter falls into
Both ways of explaining what is going on are correct and complete—one is just more detailed in the accuracy of what really, really and how really the AGN exists and the other is the simplified points.
NASA has one more area where they discuss active galactic nuclei–in the scholarly presentation hosted by their High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center. Here, they discuss the history of studying this phenomenon, the current state of the research, and all the data that goes into the theoretical and experimental understanding of AGN.
The four ways to present our topics are then used within and across the main genres of technical writing. The combination creates the overall style for presenting our topics to action-focused users. Additional lectures will explore these top genres and cover their features, expectations, use cases, and tools. For now, I just want you to understand the big-picture goals and types of things you would write in the technical communication field.
2.2 Overview of Top Genres
A genre is a form of the product that is recognizable due to the general format, structure, content, and expectations. It is why we recognize a pop album is a different genre of music from a country album. But like pop and country music, we can and do have some cross-over and blending sometimes.
- ✨ Correspondence… emails, memos, letters –the types of documents where you need to share information with a super targeted audience–you usually know exactly who the email or letter is being sent. Sometimes there is more expectation for a direct reply as well (less so with Memos but we will get into in the Project Management lecture).
- ✨ Documentation… progress reports, technical descriptions, definitions, incident reports, and such –the types of documents where we just to capture and reflect what the status or what is going on in a situation. They are focused on describing the state of being or what happened.
- ✨End-User Materials…instructions, guides, tutorials, standard operating procedures, brochures …the type of documents that command actions and tell people how to accomplish specific task or how to use the products.
- ✨Analytical Reports…. Research briefs, recommendation reports, usability, lab reports, evaluation reports … I mean the sub-genres of a technical report are vast. They all have a purpose to record, analyze, and share out the insights from data collection processes.
- ✨ Strategic Reports… proposals, operation strategies, business plans, and creative briefs… the documents where we develop and share a clear, logical, feasible model to get things done. Strategic reports are usually more persuasive, as a whole, than the other documents.
- ✨ Media…videos, podcasts, websites, verbal presentations… all the documents that combine audio and visual experiences with more interactions with the user.
Most careers use correspondence (emails, memos, letters) and strategic reports (plans) as a general. The STEM careers–those of you on the engineering and computer science tracks taking the technical writing-focused course–will practice and see more documentation (descriptions, progress reports, incident reports) and end-user materials. Those in the business track taking the business writing course will practice and see more strategic reports (proposals, business plans, marketing briefs) and media, generally. But our project options and lab session will span all 6 major genre categories.
Before we move onto section 3 about ethics, we need to recap the points and check your notes on the Styles of Technical Writing overview. You should have content and examples for the following points:
- The four main ways to present information to audiences. You should have the general definition and the type of audience best suited for each style. You should have qualities and an example for scholarly, functional, interpretative, and affective.
- The markers of style to look for when reading technical work to help you understand what style it is AND what you can consider when creating documents. I broke down the three topics when I discussed the NASA example.
- The definition of a genre and how to tell one genre from another.
- The examples of each big genre that relate most to your career goals. So what sub-genres and document types did I mention in each that you might expect to READ, USE, or CREATE in your career.
Take a little break and then prepare for this lecture’s final section: the ethics of a technical writer. 🎶🎶🎶
Section 3: Ethics in Technical Writing
Let’s talk ethics– the guiding values and expectations on behavior and conduct for a group. As people, we have some ethics, like the general golden rule:
Don’t be a self-centered, self-righteous asshole who intentionally goes out of your way to harm other people with no remorse or thought of consequence. Just kidding, sort of; we recognize this as “treat others how you want to be treated.”
Generally, that is the ideal. However, we have different ethics based on culture and community that all stack and layer. We even have distinct ethics in the university code of conduct for our community on campus to follow, and I wrote some ethical guidelines into the syllabus for us to follow as a class. Sometimes ethics are clearly written out, and other times it is a learned and implied expectation of a group. So, when we talk about ethics today, it is focused on our guiding values and principles for technical writing, which our Society for Technical Communication outlines. Most professions have an organization that sets the ethics for their field. Try searching for that body for your career goals. For many of you, it might be the IEEE (Institute for Electronics and Electrical Engineering).
3.1 Ethical Principles
How a writer presents information in a document can affect a reader’s understanding of that information’s relative weight or seriousness. Remember our qualities–that people tend to skip and scan around? Because of that tendency we actually have a bit of power in what is potentially missed by the readers and need to have a strong commitment to ethics.
For example, hiding crucial information in the middle of a long paragraph deep in a long document seriously de-emphasizes the information. On the other hand, putting a minor point in a prominent spot (say, the first item in a bulleted list in a report’s executive summary) might be a manipulative strategy to emphasize information that is not terribly important. Both of these examples could be considered unethical, as the display of information is crucial to how readers encounter and interpret it.
Given this context in our work, our society outlines 7 ethical principles to observe. They apply to most workplaces, too. I’m going to read and lightly explain them straight from the STC.org language :
We observe the laws and regulations governing our profession. We meet the terms of contracts we undertake. We ensure that all terms are consistent with laws and regulations locally and globally, as applicable, and with STC ethical·principles.
We seek to promote the public good in our activities. To the best of our ability, we provide truthful and accurate communications. We also dedicate ourselves to conciseness, clarity, coherence, and creativity, striving to meet the needs of those who use our products and services. We alert our clients and employers when we believe that material is ambiguous. Before using another person’s work, we obtain permission. We attribute authorship of material and ideas only to those who make an original and substantive contribution. We do not perform work outside our job scope during hours compensated by clients or employers, except with their permission, nor do we use their facilities, equipment, or supplies without their approval. When we advertise our services, we do so truthfully.
✨Confidentiality
We respect the confidentiality of our clients, employers, and professional organizations. We disclose business-sensitive information only with their consent or when legally required to do so. We obtain releases from clients and employers before including any business-sensitive materials in our portfolios or commercial demonstrations or before using such materials for another client or employer.
We endeavor to produce excellence in our communication products. We negotiate realistic agreements with clients and employers on schedules, budgets, and deliverables during project planning. Then we strive to fulfill our obligations in a timely, responsible manner.
We respect cultural variety and other aspects of diversity in our clients, employers, development teams, and audiences. We serve the business interests of our clients and employers as long as they are consistent with the public good. Whenever possible, we avoid conflicts of interest in fulfilling our professional responsibilities and activities. If we discern a conflict of interest, we disclose it to those concerned and obtain their approval before proceeding.
✨Professionalism
We evaluate communication products and services constructively and tactfully, and seek definitive assessments of our own professional performance. We advance technical communication through our integrity and excellence in performing each task we undertake. Additionally, we assist other persons in our profession through mentoring, networking, and instruction. We also pursue professional self-improvement, especially through courses and conferences.
In the big picture, that comes down to one big thing: ✨Do Not Mislead✨
As writers, we hold some power since we always decide what, where, and how to present information. Everything is a calculation and decision, so with [some] power, there must also come some responsibility.
Thorough research requires a writer to integrate information from a variety of reliable sources. These sources should demonstrate that the writer has examined the topic from as many angles as possible. This includes scholarly and professional research, not just from a single database or journal, for instance, but from a variety. Using a variety of sources helps the writer avoid potential bias that can occur from relying on only a few experts. The risk of intentional or accidental manipulations is most common in the visuals. Remember to provide appropriate context and perspective as you prepare your graphics. Graphics will usually be the first thing a reader notices about your document–and might not stop to look at the scale or think as hard about whether the graphic choice is representing the story best. Again, we have an entire lecture about data visuals, so for now, just understand that ethics will come back in a big way for that unit. Don’t mess with graph types’ scales, orientation, and expectations to avoid these manipulations.
Last, don’t misrepresent facts or just “twist” numbers to favor your opinion and objectives. Once you are on the job, you cannot leave out numbers that show you are behind or over budget on a project, no matter how well it may work once it is completed. Be cautious when using figures, charts, and tables, making sure they visually represent quantities with accuracy and honesty. Within misleading, we have to discuss and consider research and citation practices.
3.2 Legal Considerations
Apart from the general ethical principles, which aren’t necessarily enforceable, we also have legal requirements for ethical behavior.
✨Protecting Consumers
Documentation should prepare readers to use the product safely. US law stipulates that a manual must list any hazards that may occur “from the intended or unintended but reasonably foreseeable use of its products.”
You have a legal duty to warn consumers when:
- The product supplied is dangerous
- The danger is or should be known by the manufacturer
- The danger is present when the product is used in the usual and expected manner
Failure to “adequately” warn consumers opens your company up to lawsuits. What exactly makes a warning “adequate”? Good question. Adequacy is almost impossible to define. It is much easier to define what is not adequate. Here are a few common ways that manuals or instructions fall short:
- Failure to warn users about how to use a product properly
- Failure to warn against risks from the proper use of a product
- Failure to warn against any reasonably foreseeable misuse of a product
The key commonality is that everything listed could result in bodily harm or death. It is why we have things that seem obvious or even ‘silly’ like…
Danger: placing your fingers inside the yellow safety zone may result in losing a limb.
Safety information must also be accessible to your readers. Therefore, warnings should stand out from the rest of the documents, possibly with icons, colored fonts, or bolding. They should also be easy to understand. A confusing warning is just as bad as not warning users at all.
✨Liability and Copyright
Liability law is a legal framework that places an obligation on companies and organizations to conduct their operations responsibly. This includes requiring these entities to provide comprehensive instructions and adequate warnings to users about any potential risks associated with their products. If a consumer sustains an injury or if damages occur due to the use of the product, the company or organization can be held legally responsible and be subjected to liability. This legal principle serves as a form of consumer protection and incentivizes companies to prioritize product safety.
Warranty ties into some liability considerations. There are usually two kinds: express warranty and implied warranty. An express warranty is a clearly written or oral statement of what a product is capable of and the guarantee from a seller to a buyer that the product will meet these quality and reliability standards for a specified time. The implied warranty is connected to your product fitting the intended purpose and meeting buyer expectations. The implied warranties are often established through how the packaging is done and what is on the accompanying materials. Be very clear and cautious of claims that your packaging may make that constitute a warranty and may not be supported. This is why all vitamins and supplements have statements about the “effects being unverified” or “not supported by the FDA” to let consumers know that, technically, the claims are not fully true and protect the company.
Liability and contract laws can vary by country. If you plan on selling wares internationally, account for various regional requirements. Learn about liability concerns before you publish your manual or documentation. As always, consult a lawyer for specific information on constructing warnings.
Copyright – and gaining permission to use intellectual property– as well as protecting your company’s property is a concern, too. We will discuss copyright in the Technical Graphics lecture in-depth since visuals are the more common use or need for copyright permissions. Copyright covers everything you create, and you don’t need to register it to be protected. If someone uses your work without permission, you can take legal action for copyright infringement. Registering your copyright makes it easier to go to court if needed, though. The same goes for using other people’s work. When using someone else’s graphics, getting their permission first is important. Now, copyright infringement needs to be initiated by the holder.
As employees, typically, everything you create at work belongs to your employer as the copyright holder. Often, there is a clause in your hiring contract that outlines how anything you make using company materials and time belongs to the organization. This is why it is super important to keep your WORK and any personal projects that you hope to sell or whatever completely separate. Do NOT in any way work on your own ideas using company stuff or company time. Read your contracts carefully because you may see language around competition and developing new ideas, products, or whatever too closely related to your job and position addressed.
✨Digital Accessibility
Finally, digital accessibility is a key legal consideration for writers. We will have a full lecture on digital accessibility because it is so important–both ethically to support inclusive documents and legally to adhere.
Digital accessibility involves creating content that is accessible to individuals with various disabilities, such as visual impairments, hearing impairments, cognitive disabilities, and motor disabilities. This includes providing alternative text for images, transcripts for audio content, closed captions for videos, and ensuring that content is compatible with assistive technologies like screen readers and keyboard navigation.
From a legal standpoint, digital accessibility is protected by various laws and regulations. In the United States, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires that public entities and businesses provide equal access to their electronic content. This means that websites, online documents, and other digital content must be accessible to individuals with disabilities–and your company can be on the hook if you miss those standards, especially if you work for a public service like a government or educational setting.
Beyond the legal implications, digital accessibility is crucial for ensuring that everyone has equal access to information and opportunities. Inclusive documents promote social justice and equity by allowing individuals with disabilities to participate fully as the standard without having to request accommodations or feel that extra burden. They can access educational resources, job opportunities, and other essential services without barriers.
Writers have a significant role to play in promoting digital accessibility by creating content that is easy for everyone to understand and navigate. This involves using clear and concise language, structuring content logically, and providing alternative formats for different disabilities. By incorporating digital accessibility into their writing practices, writers can contribute to a more inclusive and equitable digital landscape.
3.3 Logical Fallacies
The final topic in this section on ethics is a discussion of common logical fallacies–the powerful but poor strategies to present or argue your point of view that aren’t grounded in ethical, reasonable, and real points.
There are dozens, so I will cover the main ones that creep up in technical and professional contexts more. Review these as both warnings against unethical arguments you might make and also to recognize when a source or a person is using them in the information you read.
✨ Ad Hominem is attacking the person instead of the arguments, basically. It is used so OFTEN because it is such low-hanging fruit, but invalidating a position based on irrelevant personal traits instead of the issue at hand just distracts. Similar to ad hominem, a Red Herring actively tries to distract and shift the focus by introducing irrelevant or barely connected points. Don’t let people in an argument or in their writing distract you from the facts and logic of the matter at hand.
✨ Straw Man argues with exaggerated and inaccurate versions of the argument or topic. It is often paired with the Slippery Slope , which claims a more serious or extreme consequence will happen due to the starting point or single event. Try not to let yourself and others build unrealistic, unlikely, and undersupported outcomes with these fallacies. Stick to the documented and reasonable correlations or patterns of events.
✨When we research for our technical writing, it can be easy to fall into a Hasty Generalization or an Appeal to Authority where we make statements and conclusions after just a few examples–that could be outliers or small compared to the bigger picture– or focus too much on the arguers expertise. The Appeal to Authority does state that the expertise is irrelevant or overstated, so… just because I have expertise in technical writing, that doesn’t mean you should take my claims to any old topic. Just the ones actually related to this class AND review the added perspective materials I provide where other authors explain the topics and other examples are used.
✨The last set of appeals that are most relevant to writing situations is the Causal Fallacy , which implies a relationship between things, especially a correlation (so one thing causes the other) when really it might be an association at best. These sometimes show up with Circular Arguments , where the premise becomes the conclusion instead of adding new information and justification. I personally see statements and writing that follows the Casual Fallacy and the Circular writing with our LLM interns. The AI systems have a tendency to try and connect things and repeat the premise of your prompt as evidence. So, really watch out for that.
Again, there are loads of logical fallacies that are applied to more argumentative debate contexts. As technical writers, we don’t often partake in truly persuasive or argument-building situations. Instead, we need to look more at what our research, sources, and overall data may display. When analyzing data, it is possible to accidentally build on or use these fallacies, so stay critical and think through the logic of your work.
You should have notes on the following areas with examples to help you remember and relate the information to your own life and career.
- The 6 official ethical principles for technical writing
- The single big-picture ethics to act on in your careers
- The legal obligations for protecting consumers
- The difference in liability and warranty
- How to protect yourself from copyright issues
- What consequences can happen with digital accessibility requirements
- 8 logical fallacies that are more common for technical writing
We’ve reached the end of this lecture on Introduction to Technical Writing! Please look over your notes as we review the key areas you should have definitions, examples, and applications. You can play this podcast back and reference the transcript/book chapter.
✨Technical Writing as a Discipline
- Technical writing is different from essay writing. It is reader-focused and action-oriented, and it is formatted to be easily scanned.
- Technical writing can include print, digital, interactive, and audio/visual material.
- The key characteristics of technical writing are that it is useful, usable, and enjoyable.
- A good visual strategy is important for technical writing. Key principles include contrast, repetition, alignment, proximity, and size.
✨Styles of Technical Writing
- There are four main ways to present information in technical writing: scholarly, functional, interpretive, and affective.
- Scholarly writing is theoretical and academic, and it is intended for expert-level readers.
- Functional writing is practical and jargon-heavy, and it is intended for practitioners.
- Interpretive writing explains concepts in general terms, and it is intended for non-experts.
- Affective writing focuses on sharing an experience and connecting with the audience.
- The style of writing should be chosen based on the audience and the purpose of the document.
- There are six main genres of technical writing: correspondence, documentation, end-user materials, analytical reports, strategic reports, and media.
✨Ethics in Technical Writing
- Technical writers have an ethical obligation to not mislead readers.
- Information should be presented in a way that is accurate, complete, and unbiased.
- Writers should avoid plagiarism and copyright infringement.
- Digital accessibility is a key ethical consideration for technical writers.
- Writers should be aware of common logical fallacies and avoid using them in their work.
We made it through this lecture on Technical Writing at large and as an introduction. Good work and thanks, associates.
Credits and Sourcing
Information and content in this lecture is derived from a combination of the following sources and the creator–my–personal experiences in education, technical environments, and professional roles. This content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike, so you are free and encouraged to distribute and remix any part in any new medium for your goals. Please ensure your creations are available under the same license to keep the information spreading.
Chapter 1: Introduction to Technical Writing. Copyright 2019 by Mike Markel and Stuart A. Selber in Practical Strategies for Technical Communication. Published by Bedford St. Martin’s.
Technical and Professional Writing Genres. Copyright 2019 licensed under a CC: BY, NC, SA. By Michael Beilfuss; Staci Bettes; and Katrina Peterson. https://open.library.okstate.edu/technicalandprofessionalwriting/front-matter/158/
Technical Writing Essentials Copyright © by Suzan Last and UNH College of Professional Studies Online is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution
Acknowledgements
Technical Writing and Presentation Copyright © 2024 by Hayley Blackburn is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
May 24, 2012 · The document is a PowerPoint presentation that defines technical writing and compares it to academic writing. It states that technical writing aims to convey information clearly and directly so readers can access specific details easily. In contrast, academic writing may lack a clear purpose and use more complex language and structure.
Oct 25, 2012 · It contrasts technical writing with creative writing and provides tips for writers such as defining the purpose and audience, determining an appropriate level of detail, and organizing information. The document also reviews elements of good technical writing style like using active voice and simple sentences as well as phrases and words that ...
Mar 26, 2015 · The goals of technical writing are to deliver technical information to readers based on their needs and background, and to communicate with a specific audience for a specific purpose. Some key characteristics of effective technical writing are understanding the purpose and audience, providing accurate information clearly using efficient words ...
Generally speaking, a technical presentation will: Condense a longer text, such as a formal report; Summarize the most important, useful, or meaningful information from that text; Use visuals, text, and audio together in order to tell a story; Most often, presentations work to inform, to persuade, or both.
Technical Writing and Presentation (the art and science of knowledge engineering) Riadh Habash “The fundamental purpose of scientific discourse is not the mere presentation of information and thought but rather its actual communication. It does not matter how pleased an author might be to have converted all the right data into sentences and
1 Introduction to Technical Writing . Week 1 Lecture. Hey associates, this lecture is about technical writing and presentation as a form of communication. It is an overview of our field, and this class, focused on STEM, professional, and business writing contexts.