harrison bergeron critical essay

Home — Essay Samples — Arts & Culture — Cultural Anthropology — The Dangers of Equality: A Critical Analysis of Harrison Bergeron

The Dangers of Equality: a Critical Analysis of Harrison Bergeron

Categories: Cultural Anthropology

About this sample

Words: 467 |

Published: Mar 8, 2024

Words: 467 | Page: 1 | 3 min read

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Let us write you an essay from scratch

450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr. Karlyna PhD

Verified writer

Expert in: Arts & Culture

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

3 pages / 1559 words

2 pages / 1118 words

1 pages / 620 words

2 pages / 969 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Cultural Anthropology

Honor is a concept that has been valued throughout history by societies around the world. It is often associated with integrity, honesty, and respect. Honor can be seen as both an individual trait and a societal expectation. In [...]

Family is one of the most important aspects of a person’s life. It provides a sense of belonging, love, and support, and it plays a crucial role in shaping an individual's identity and personality. For me, my family is [...]

Cultural relativism is the idea that a person's beliefs, values, and practices should be understood based on that person's own culture, rather than be judged against the criteria of another culture. This concept has been a topic [...]

Diversity in the classroom refers to the variety of differences that exist among students, including but not limited to race, ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, language, culture, and learning styles. In today's globalized [...]

In "Eating Christmas in the Kalahari" by Richard Borshay Lee, the author provides an ethnographic account of his experiences living among the !Kung San people in the Kalahari Desert. Lee's initial excitement and anticipation for [...]

The weaponry of the Sioux Tribe is a fascinating and important aspect of Native American history and culture. The weapons used by the Sioux Tribe were not only essential for hunting and self-defense, but they also held deep [...]

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

Instructions Followed To The Letter
Deadlines Met At Every Stage
Unique And Plagiarism Free

Literary Theory and Criticism

Home › Literature › Analysis of Kurt Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron

Analysis of Kurt Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron

By NASRULLAH MAMBROL on May 25, 2021

Kurt Vonnegut is celebrated more for his longer fiction than for his short stories. Nonetheless, Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron,” originally published in the Magazine of Fantasy and Science in October 1961, and currently available in the author’s collection, Welcome to the Monkey House , is a very popular short story and is often cited as an example of dystopian science fiction with an emphasis on egalitarianism. One segment of the 1972 teleplay Between Time and Timbuktu was based on the story, and it was later adapted into a TV movie, Harrison Bergeron (1995), with Sean Astin in the title role.

Set in 2081, the story depicts society’s vain search for absolute equality. Specifically, this new world does not attempt to raise standards for the disabled or handicapped but rather chooses to implement a more onerous solution: to impede those who have superior intellect, beauty, or strength. This solution deprives individuals of their talents by employing masks, loud noises, and weights in an attempt to level the playing field for the less talented. Actually the government is attempting to place all members of society at the level of the lowest common denominator, a process that is overseen by the United States Handicapper General, the shotgun-toting Diana Moon Glampers, whose primary goal is to rid society of anyone who might threaten mediocrity and inadequacy. A similar (though less developed) version of this character and idea appeared in Vonnegut’s earlier novel, The Sirens of Titan.

In this brave new world, the exceptional are consistently repressed, arrested, thrown into mental institutions, and ultimately killed for failing to be average. The central and title character, Harrison Bergeron, is, of course, a threat to this community since he is physically fit, handsome, intellectual, and, what is worse, rebellious. As a result, he is forced to bear enormous handicaps. These include distracting noises, 300- pounds of excess weight, eyeglasses to give him headaches, and cosmetic changes to make him ugly. Despite these handicaps, however, he is able to invade a TV station and declare himself the new emperor. He then strips himself of his handicaps and begins to dance with a ballerina whose amazing beauty and skills have also been distorted by the authoritarian government in an attempt to restrict her advancement and recognition as a superior individual. As the couple dance in defiance of the “rules,” the two defy gravity as they “kiss” the ceiling and assert their artistic independence as well as their refusal to be controlled by an outside authority. The story ends abruptly with two shotgun blasts, suggesting to the reader that there is no forgiveness for those who defy society’s demand for conformity to the ordinary. Added poignancy is created by the framing story, in which Bergeron’s parents are watching TV and observe their son’s demise but cannot concentrate enough to remember the incident or assess its importance. Vonnegut’s point seems to be that without the nonconformists, the dreamers, and the different, society is doomed. The good intention of equality is marred by the way society decides to maintain it. To be fair to one group, it must necessarily be unfair to another. Yet if the brilliant and talented are hindered, society will be unable to improve, and the status quo will be all it can hope for.

Kurt Vonnegut/The New York Times

Vonnegut’s more pessimistic view of life may be termed absurdist. In this future society, growth and experimentation are no longer fostered, and science and technologies are devised to hurt rather than to help humankind. The complacency of Harrison’s parents who witness his murder and yet cannot remember why they are so sad indicates they both have submitted to a world where rebellion is not tolerated and where sameness is fostered and encouraged.

While many critics have considered Vonnegut’s story as an attack on the attempt to level all individuals, what Vonnegut is really assailing is the public’s understanding of what that leveling entails. Critics like Roy Townsend and Stanley Shatt seem to have missed the underlying irony of “Bergeron,” as well as its unreliable narrator, preferring to stress the obvious and ignore the fact that the story line offers an assessment of the foolishness that is “common sense.” Common sense is shown to be ridiculous in its assumptions about equality and in its belief that a sense of morality and ethics is intuitive. Moreover, since Vonnegut’s politics were Leftist in nature, it is unlikely that he would attack the concepts of communism and socialism.

In fact, it is Harrison himself who embodies the past oppression of a dominant culture, and readers should remember his desire is to be emperor, to reassert his superiority and the power it entitles him to wield. Instead Vonnegut seems to satirize society’s limited view of egalitarianism as only intelligence, looks, and athleticism. He never addresses income distribution (the separation between rich and poor) or class prejudice (the difference between the powerful and the powerless) even though both are signifcant issues for America. The mediocrity Vonnegut decries is not a result of the future but a continuation of past practices, an antiintellectualism that is depicted in Harrison’s parents, Hazel and George, whose ideas seem to be shaped by what they see on TV and little else. Controlled by a corrupt value system that says to ignore sad things and be satisfied with normality, it is their world that is condemned more than the world of Diana Moon Glampers. They have facilitated her rise to power with all the coldness and sterility that one might associate with the lunar goddess. Freedom is not the greatest good for the smallest number; nor does it hold that a classruled society will promulgate economic success. Though the story’s message appears quite simple, its moral is rather complex, forcing individual readers to think twice before they reduce its meaning to a sentence or two. Vonnegut was clearly not just trying to side with the radical Right’s objections to big government, and “Harrison Bergeron” is definite evidence of how his convoluted texts beg for more contemplation than they have been previously given

Harrison Bergeron - Free Essay Samples And Topic Ideas

Harrison Bergeron is a satirical dystopian short story by Kurt Vonnegut that explores themes of equality, government control, and the suppression of individual excellence. Essays on this topic might delve into the analysis of its themes, Vonnegut’s satirical style, or the societal critiques embedded within the narrative. Comparing this work to other dystopian literature or analyzing its relevance to contemporary discussions on equality and individualism can offer a rich literary and sociopolitical exploration. We have collected a large number of free essay examples about Harrison Bergeron you can find in Papersowl database. You can use our samples for inspiration to write your own essay, research paper, or just to explore a new topic for yourself.

Equality in Harrison Bergeron

“Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut takes place in year 2081. In this future, the government has supposedly made everyone “equal.” The author suggests that total equality is not an ideal worth striving for, as many people believe, but it is a mistaken goal that is dangerous in both execution as well as outcome. To obtain physical and mental equality among all Americans, the government in Vonnegut’s story tortures its citizens. They will gradually lose their individuality by being forced to […]

The “Average Man” and Survival Issue

Survival has always necessitated the existence of communities for human beings. Over countless generations, people have evolved to be good at conforming into the societies they live in, since those who couldn’t were often the first to die. There’s safety in numbers, but to belong to a group and be protected there is always a need to sacrifice some of one’s preferences and desires. H.L. Mencken, a social critic during the 20th century, argues human beings take the need to […]

Satire and Equality in Harrison Bergeron

Introduction Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron," first published in 1961, serves as a compelling satire that critiques the notion of enforced equality. The narrative is set in a dystopian future, specifically the year 2081, where the government imposes physical and mental handicaps to ensure absolute equality among all citizens. This essay explores how Vonnegut uses satire to mock the extreme measures taken to achieve equality, highlighting the absurdity and dangers of such societal structures. The central thesis asserts that […]

We will write an essay sample crafted to your needs.

Enforced Equality in Harrison Bergeron

In Kurt Vonnegut Jr.'s short story "Harrison Bergeron," the theme of enforced equality serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of sacrificing individuality for uniformity. The narrative explores the extreme lengths to which a government might go to achieve absolute equality, using handicaps to suppress the talents and abilities of its citizens. This essay examines how Vonnegut uses the characters, tone, and symbolic elements to critique the concept of enforced equality. Through these elements, the story highlights the importance […]

Striving for Equality: a Double-Edged Sword

In his compelling short story "Harrison Bergeron," Kurt Vonnegut takes us on a journey to the year 2081, where the concept of equality is taken to an extreme in a dystopian United States. This fictional society has enacted the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments, ensuring that no one is smarter, stronger, or more attractive than anyone else. While the idea of absolute equality might sound appealing, Vonnegut's tale reveals the dark underbelly of such a pursuit. Through the oppressive oversight […]

Satirical Insights in Harrison Bergeron

Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron," first published in 1961, serves as a profound satire that critiques the notion of enforced equality. Set in the dystopian future of 2081, the narrative explores a society where the government mandates absolute equality among its citizens through the use of physical and mental handicaps. This story raises significant questions about the ethical and societal implications of such enforced uniformity. By examining the symbolic elements, irony, and the consequences of the government's oppressive measures, […]

The Paradox of Equality in Harrison Bergeron

Deep within the human heart beats an eternal longing for equality, driving societies toward greater justice. However, have we ever paused to contemplate the ramifications of achieving total and absolute equality? In Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron," this concept is examined in depth, presenting a dystopian vision of a society obsessed with fairness. This essay argues that Vonnegut illustrates the inherent dangers of pursuing absolute equality, as represented through the characters of Diana Moon Glampers and Harrison Bergeron. The […]

Essay about Kurt Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron

"Kurt Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron is a satirical short story that deals with the themes of equality, media, and government control. It is a short, yet powerful piece that approaches the popular topics from an unpopular perspective and ultimately makes an unforgettable impression on the reader with its hidden warning. The themes explored by the author in this short story are equality as well as political and media control and manipulation. The ultimate message of the short story is that the […]

Harrison Bergeron: the Rebellion for Freedom

Beauty masked. The strong are forced to pretend to be weak. The brightest minds forced to average intelligence. Equality in all people with all abilities is only possible with complete control and a lack of freedom to be different. Kurt Vonnegut’s dystopian, science fiction, “Harrison Bergeron” was published in October of 1961. The story takes place in a futuristic America that is plagued with the obsession of everyone being equal. People who are graced with bright minds, beautiful faces, or […]

“Harrison Bergeron” Creates a Society

“In “Harrison Bergeron,” he creates a society, seemingly American, whose government has gone awry in its attempts to make everyone equal”(Carl Mowery). This story is a utopian story, which means everything is perfect and everything is the same. People couldn’t look better than others and were not allowed to be better at anything than others. Handicaps are given out so no individual is seen greater than equal. Everyone is different in their own ways and should be able to express […]

Kurt Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron”

"Kurt Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron” is a dystopian society where equality is mandated by law through extreme measures like weights for the strong, distraction devices for the intelligent, and masks for the beautiful. The premise is that because everyone is the “same” or “equal” there will be no conflicts because there are no differences. Vonnegut exhibits a command of metafiction through the near deadpan interactions and shocking lack empathy of his characters. Contrary to typical literary techniques that are designed to […]

Freedom Limits in Dystopian Literature

Introduction The governments of the USA and other developed countries in Europe often take various measures to protect democracy and cultivate democratic principles, ideas, and values among their citizens. These measures typically include ensuring equality and justice for all people and creating equal opportunities for personal and professional development, as well as fostering economic, political, and social prosperity. However, these noble goals sometimes become distorted when political elites, despite their declarations of fighting inequality and injustice, instead establish false and […]

“Harrison Bergeron”: Vonnegut’s Vision of Forced Equality

In an era that clamored for change and civil rights, Kurt Vonnegut emerged as a thought-provoking voice with his dystopian short story "Harrison Bergeron." Set in a future America where every individual is made "equal" by the 211th, 212th, and 213th amendments to the Constitution, Vonnegut crafts a satirical commentary on the dangers of enforced equality. This narrative is a complex exploration of the boundaries between individuality and societal norms, pushing readers to question the price of uniformity. At the […]

Unraveling the Enigma of Harrison Bergeron

In the annals of American literature, few short stories have captivated readers and provoked contemplation quite like Kurt Vonnegut's "Harrison Bergeron." This dystopian masterpiece, published in 1961, offers a satirical glimpse into a world where equality is taken to absurd extremes. With its thought-provoking narrative and rich symbolism, "Harrison Bergeron" remains as relevant today as it was when it first graced the pages of a magazine. In this exploration, we'll delve into the themes, characters, and lasting impact of this […]

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers

EnglishWithLatini.com

A Critical Analysis of Harrison Bergeron

The Politics of Kurt Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron Critical Essay

According to all commentary on Kurt Vonnegut's "Harrison Bergeron," the theme of this satire is that attempts to achieve equality are absurd. For example, Peter Reed says it "satirizes an obsession with equalizing ..." (29). The critics have taken this text's absurd future utopia as representative of egalitarianism. For example, Stanley Schatt claims that "in any leveling process, what really is lost, according to Vonnegut, is beauty, grace, and wisdom" (133). But the object of Vonnegut's satire is not all leveling--"any leveling process" that might arise. Rather, the object of his satire is the popular misunderstanding of what leveling and equality entail. More specifically, this text satirizes America's Cold War misunderstanding of not just communism but also socialism. To argue that thesis, this article begins outside of the text by situating it in Vonnegut's oeuvre: his fiction, nonfiction, speeches, and interviews. Then this contextualization will attend to Vonnegut's audience. Finally, the analysis will turn to the internal evidence.

If "Harrison Bergeron" is a satire against the Left, then it is inconsistent with the rest of Vonnegut's fiction. For a view of his fiction's politics in general, one need only recall Jailbird's satire on conservatism and its sympathy with striking laborers, or the endorsement of income redistribution in God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater. A specific illustration of his politics occurs in the dedication of Hocus Pocus to socialist Eugene Debs, which quotes him: "While there is a lower class I am in it" (8).

Like his fiction, Vonnegut's non-fiction also satirizes the Right and endorses the Left. And the Left it endorses is not liberalism (America is one of the few nations where liberalism is not centrist). For example, "In a Manner that Must Shame God Himself," which he wrote in response to the 1972 Republican National Convention, claims that Democrats are only a little less Darwinist than Republicans. He satirizes not only the Republicans but also the Democrats as "bossed by Winners" at the expense of "Losers." He concludes, "THE WINNERS ARE AT WAR WITH THE LOSERS, AND THE FIX IS ON" (206). In "Yes, We Have No Nirvanas," he derides notions about "the fairness of the marketplace" (38). In Fates Worse than Death, he refers to the British class system as "robbery" (132). And in his preface to Wampeters, Foma and Granfaloons, he enjoins his readers to "share wealth and work" (xxiv).

His spoken word is consistent with his fiction and nonfiction. In an interview, he said of George Orwell, "I like his socialism" (Clancy 53). He said in a commencement speech at Bennington College, "I suggest that you work for a socialist form of government ... It isn't moonbeams to talk of modest plenty for all. They have it in Sweden"(168). In an address at Wheaton College, he even quoted Karl Marx approvingly: "From each according to his abilities. To each according to his needs" (217). When asked in an interview how he would have campaigned against Nixon, he responded, "I would have set the poor against the rich" ("Playboy" 273).

In a letter to me, Vonnegut indicated that the foregoing sympathy with "Losers" influenced "Harrison Bergeron." If the misreadings of this text were valid, then the implied author's sympathy would be for Harrison Bergeron and his antipathy would be for Diana Moon Glampers, the Handicapper General striving to prevent privilege. But Vonnegut suggests that the character he identifies with is not Bergeron but Glampers. He begins his letter by first situating himself as not only an author with both conscious and unconscious intent, but also a reader. He writes about not only what he consciously and unconsciously intended, but also what the resulting text actually is.

I can't be sure, but there is a possibility that my story "Harrison

Bergeron" is about the envy and self-pity I felt in an over-achievers' high

school in Indianapolis quite a while ago now. Some people never tame those

emotions. John Wilkes Booth and Lee Harvey Oswald and Mark David Chapman

come to mind. "Handicapper Generals," if you like.

What the story is "about" has two meanings. The first is intent--the conscious mind's intent (he could not remember everything about producing the text) and the unconscious mind's intent (he is probably inferring it rather than relying on evidence such as dreams). Of course, intent does not necessarily establish effect; intent does not necessarily tell us what the text is "about." But it might lead the reader to what a text is about--not just to its origins, but also to its implicit theme. Accordingly, this article argues that the author's oeuvre, the author's intent, and "Harrison Bergeron's" internal evidence are all consistent with each other.

This absurd dystopia's version of equality sounds like something from the pages of popular magazines during the Cold War--because it is. Vonnegut depended on those magazines to establish himself as a writer. ("Harrison Bergeron" first appeared in the Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction.) Just as Twain could not have sold Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and Pudd'nhead Wilson if their sympathy with African-American characters had been obvious, so Vonnegut could not have sold a story overtly sympathetic to leveling. Instead, the Handicapper General apparently recalls the likes of John Wilkes Booth, proponent of slavery. (But the coming analysis will reveal that Harrison is the one who embodies a feudal society.) As a struggling writer, Vonnegut had to put a surface on this story that would appeal to his audience. And it did. More specifically, it did so because it appeared to rehearse central tenets of the dominant culture's ideology. It appealed to the literal-minded with such accuracy that William F. Buckley's National Review reprinted it as a morality tale about the dangers of forsaking private enterprise. Here is the narrator's presentation of this utopia's muddled definition of equality:

The year was 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren't only equal

before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was any

smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else.

Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else. (5)

This definition codifies the common American objections not just to communist states, but also to socialist ones. The narrator begins with the widespread assertion that the United States not only can and does know God's law, but that God's favorite country is instituting it. (American history is replete with statements like Ronald Reagan's that his policies reflect God's will--see, e.g., his 1982 address to the National Catholic Education Association). So the narrator's definition of America's equality begins not by positing a future equality as much as exposing the misunderstanding of it in the past and present.

The narrator continues to give not a possible egalitarianism of the future (because, as will be noted, the text's version is physically impossible) but rather an enactment of how absurd society would be if egalitarianism were what America's dominant culture thinks it is. The narrator defines equality only in terms of intelligence, looks, and athletic ability. There is nothing about kinds of intelligence, or how it is used. Similarly, beauty includes only the human appearance; there is nothing about painting, architecture, etc. The first two concerns, intelligence and looks, address two of the traditional categories of philosophy: the true (epistemology) and the beautiful (aesthetics). The third category, the good (ethics), vanishes. Sport replaces it. No wonder there is nothing in the story about the ethics of spending huge amounts of time, money, and natural resources on sports.

Likewise, the story does not address the primary purpose of leveling in other countries: income redistribution. Since Hazel, Harrison's mother, wants the television announcer to get a raise, the definition of "equal every which way" cannot include incomes. According to the proponents of the ideology of America's dominant culture, equal income redistribution would contradict the fact that some are smarter than others (the corollary: the rich are smart and the poor are dumb), and also contradict the fact that some are better looking or more athletic than others (the corollary: attractive and athletic people deserve wealth). Since the power of class and the benefits of income redistribution are obscured in the dominant culture's ideology, the inequalities caused by class differences are appropriately absent from this story. For example, there is nothing about equal access to education or medical care.

The mediocrity depicted in this text is not of the future, but of the past and present. And the cause is America's form of egalitarianism: anti-intellectual leveling. Since the age of Jackson, there has been no one so uncommon as the so-called "common man." The characters are not displaying the mindlessness of 2081; they are displaying the mindlessness of 1961, the year this story appeared. The reason Hazel wants the inept announcer to get a raise is that he tried his best. And George, Harrison's father, says, "Forget sad things" (10). Even if ignoring sad things leads to sadder things, ignorance is bliss. Moreover, the intellectual leveling of the past and present implies that ignorance is knowledge. Hazel asks, "Who knows better'n I do what normal is?" (6). Just because she typifies the normal does not mean she understands it. For Hazel, then, she has more expertise than any social scientist with a mountain of data.

It is fitting that the athletic characters in this text are held down by birdshot and that the plot resolution comes when the chief leveler, the Handicapper General, blasts Harrison and his intended with a shotgun. As Richard Slotkin has shown, it was during the frontier expansion that America extended its racist classism in part by developing its anti-intellectualism. Also appropriate is the fact that Harrison's parents are watching a televised ballet, thereby referring to the absurd position that economic leveling means there would be no competition and nobody would be any better than anybody else. The Russian ballet and Swedish theatre (two nations often cited at the time as exemplifying the absurdity of leveling) were highly competitive; they did not hold that all people are equally talented. According to the ideology of America's dominant culture, Russia and Sweden's expenditures on the arts were perverse because they were publicly funded, while America's were pure because they were privately funded--or, rather under funded. In America's master narratives, only the public sphere costs the citizens. (Currently, however, with the high cost of seeing either a doctor or a baseball game, more Americans understand that the citizens pay private sector costs.) That Hazel and George are watching television is another appropriate metonym of the contradictions of American ideology. In this story, interpellation is the function not of the private media but government-controlled media. The government manages the station on which George and Hazel watch the ballet, and the headphone noises jamming George's thoughts come from a "government transmitter" (5). George misses the televising of his son's murder because George is in the kitchen getting a beer. Presumably he would not have missed it had it been on private television, for he could have left during a commercial.

Critics have missed the object of this text's satire because they miss the irony of the narration. They do not recognize the narration as unreliable. (Given what we know about the author, the narrator cannot be the authorial delegate.) Part of the reason they miss the narration's unreliability is that the plot hides the undeniability of the irony until the end. It is not until the plot resolution that the physically impossible happens. First, Harrison tears "straps guaranteed to support five thousand pounds" (9). Then he and his intended defy gravity by hovering in the air. After that impossible event, the preposterousness of the preceding events emerges more clearly. For example, in a society in which no one is more intelligent than anyone else, everyone would be as stupid as the most mentally deficient person in the populace, and, therefore, all would be unable even to feed themselves. But the critics miss this plot development. For example, Roy Townsend claims that this is "effectively a `no-plot' situation because nothing happens ..." (99).

Perhaps such critics miss what happens and the unreliability of the narration because they are interpellated into the very ideology that the text satirizes. For example, Schatt refers to the handicapper General, Diana Moon Glampers, as "Glompers," perhaps associating the name with labor leader Samuel F. Gompers. (133). And Townsend contends, "The story is a satire, a parody of an ideological society divorced from common sense reality" (100). But the American common sense version of equality is nonsense. Townsend claims, "Vonnegut is appealing to an instinctive sense of what is right and decent" (102). The common sense notion that ethics are instinctive is common nonsense.

Those who hold Harrison up as a model of freedom overlook the fact that he is a would-be dictator. "I am the Emperor," he declares. "I shall now select my Empress." He tells the musicians, "I'll make you barons and dukes and earls" (9). Thus Bergeron endorses monarchy. If there is a reversion to medieval monarchy, there will be serfs--the functional equivalent of slaves.

So this story satirizes not just mistaken notions of equality. It also satirizes the American definition of freedom as the greatest good to the smallest number. The American myth is that only in a class society can everyone have an equal chance for achieving the greatest economic inequality.

WORKS CITED

Clancy, Laurie. "Running Experiments Off: An Interview." Meanjin Quarterly 30 (Autumn, 1971): 46-54.

Reed, Peter. "Hurting 'Til It Laughs." Kurt Vonnegut: Images and Representations. Ed. Marc Leeds and Peter J. Reed. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood, 2000. 19-38.

Schatt, Stanley. Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. Boston: Hall, 1976.

Slotkin, Richard. The Fatal Environment: The Myth of the Frontier in the Age of Industrialism, 1880-1890. New York: Atheneum, 1985.

--. Gunfighter Nation: The Myth of the Frontier in Twentieth-Century America. New York: Atheneum, 1992.

--. Regeneration through Violence: The Mythology of the American Frontier. Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan UP, 1973.

Townsend, Roy. "Eliot and Vonnegut: Modernism and Postmodernism?" Journal of English 16 (1988): 90-104.

Vonnegut, Kurt, Jr. "Address at Rededication of Wheaton College Library." Wampeters 211-19.

--. "Address to Graduating Class at Bennington College, 1970." Wampeters 159-68.

--. Fates Worse Than Death: An Autobiographical Collage of the 1980s. New York: Putnam's, 1991.

--. "Harrison Bergeron." Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction Oct. 1961: 5-10.

--. Hocus Pocus. New York: Putnam's, 1990.

--. "In a Manner that Would Shame God Himself." Wampeters 185-206.

--. Letter to the author. 23 Oct. 2000.

--. "Playboy Interview." Wampeters 237-85.

--. Wampeters, Foma and Granfaloons (Opinions). New York: Delacorte/ Seymour Lawrence, 1974.

--. "Yes, We Have No Nirvanas." Wampeters 31-41.

DARRYL HATTENHAUER is associate professor of American Literature at Arizona State University West. He has held two Fulbrights (Denmark [ 1986-87] and Sweden [1987-88]). He has published articles on Nathaniel Hawthorne, Herman Melville, Emily Dickinson, Stephen Crane, Jack London, Charles Chesnutt, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ernest Hemingway, Edith Wharton, Sinclair Lewis, William Faulkner, Nathanael West, Zora Neale Hurston, Eudora Welty, James Baldwin, Saul Bellow, Cynthia Ozick, and Leslie Marmon Silko. His book on Shirley Jackson is forthcoming from the State University of New York Press, and he is writing a book on James Purdy.

IMAGES

Harrison Bergeron
HARRISON BERGERON
Kurt Vonnegut: Harrison Bergeron Story Summary And Analysis Example (600 Words)
A Critical Analysis of Harrison Bergeron Free Essay Example
Harrison Bergeron Summary Storyboard Door kristy-littlehale
Harrison Bergeron Summary Essay Free Essay Example

COMMENTS

Harrison Bergeron Critical Essays - eNotes.com
Essays and criticism on Kurt Vonnegut Jr.'s Harrison Bergeron - Critical Overview. Our Holiday Sale is ON! 50% off your Subscription, for a limited time only!
The Dangers of Equality: a Critical Analysis of Harrison Bergeron
Mar 8, 2024 · In conclusion, "Harrison Bergeron" serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of pursuing absolute equality. Through the use of physical and intellectual handicaps, Vonnegut shows the negative effects that such policies can have on individuality, creativity, and humanity.
Analysis of Kurt Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron
May 25, 2021 · Kurt Vonnegut is celebrated more for his longer fiction than for his short stories. Nonetheless, Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron,” originally published in the Magazine of Fantasy and Science in October 1961, and currently available in the author’s collection, Welcome to the Monkey House, is a very popular short story and is often cited as an example…
Harrison Bergeron Essays and Criticism - eNotes.com
Essays and criticism on Kurt Vonnegut Jr.'s Harrison Bergeron - Essays and Criticism. ... As Martha Meek pointed out in Critical Survey of Short Fiction (1993), ‘‘The reader is suddenly aware ...
Harrison Bergeron - Free Essay Samples And Topic Ideas
In Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron," this concept is examined in depth, presenting a dystopian vision of a society obsessed with fairness. This essay argues that Vonnegut illustrates the inherent dangers of pursuing absolute equality, as represented through the characters of Diana Moon Glampers and Harrison Bergeron. The […]
Deconstructing Equality and Conformity in 'Harrison Bergeron ...
Dec 18, 2023 · Introduction. Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron" is a thought-provoking exploration of a dystopian society obsessed with enforcing equality at all costs. Set in a future where every citizen is subjected to handicaps designed to level the playing field, the story delves into themes of conformity and the consequences of extreme egalitarianism.
A Critical Analysis of Harrison Bergeron Free Essay Example
Apr 15, 2016 · Essay Sample: In the year 2081, all of society is compelled to achieve a state of absolute equality. In Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.'s poignant short story, Harrison Bergeron,
EnglishWithLatini.com - A Critical Analysis of Harrison Bergeron
The Politics of Kurt Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron Critical Essay According to all commentary on Kurt Vonnegut's "Harrison Bergeron," the theme of this satire is that attempts to achieve equality are absurd. For example, Peter Reed says it "satirizes an obsession with equalizing ..." (29). The
Harrison Bergeron Literary Analysis Free Essay Example
Aug 4, 2021 · A Critical Analysis of Harrison Bergeron Pages: 5 (1207 words) The Use of Satire in the Novel Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut Pages: 10 (2793 words) "Harrison Bergeron" Book Reflection Pages: 2 (401 words) Comparison of “The Lottery” and “Harrison Bergeron” Pages: 4 (1006 words)
Harrison Bergeron Analysis - eNotes.com
Critical Essays Critical Overview Essays and Criticism ... "Harrison Bergeron" is notable for the way it depicts the United States government. In Harrison's world, the Constitution has been ...