tdoc education strategic plan

• Tennessee Prison College Coalition

Partner driven, student-centered action for Tennessee

Tpcc at a glance.

TPCC Partners

Tennessee Higher Education Initiative (THEI)

Tennessee Department of Correction (TDOC)

Tennessee higher education commission.

Tennessee Board of Regents

Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development

The Office of Governor Bill Lee

Tpcc priorities, centering students.

Expanding Access and Reducing Barriers

Ensuring Quality and Equity

Student Support

Data Sharing and Partnership

Culture Shifting

Why Higher Education in Prison?

Learning community resources, history of hep in tennessee, tpcc year one report.

“Education was the game changer that I needed.”

The Work of TPCC has been made possible by generous support from the ECMC Foundation and the Laughing Gull Foundation.

Stay in touch. Subscribe to our quarterly newsletter.

• Our Board of Directors
• Our Partners
• Education Programs
• Transitional Programs
• Alumni Network
• Policy and Practice
• Work for THEI
• Learning Community

Three Pillars of Strategic Planning in Higher Education: A Framework for Building Sustainable Institutions Through Holistic Planning, Alignment, and Stakeholder Engagement

Table of contents.

Strategic Planning Framework: Using the Three Pillars of Holistic Thinking to Improve Higher Education Sustainability

Strategic planning in higher education has never been more critical than it is today. As institutions navigate an increasingly complex and volatile landscape, the need for a comprehensive framework to ensure long-term sustainability has become paramount. Yet many colleges and universities struggle to implement effective strategic planning processes that drive real institutional transformation.

Higher education is at a crossroads, with colleges and universities facing economic pressures, demographic changes, and shifting public perceptions. The traditional model of higher education has been disrupted by several factors, including the decreasing number of college-age students, increasing costs, and a shift in public sentiment that questions the value of a college degree. This shift is particularly challenging for institutions heavily reliant on tuition revenue that are facing increased competition from non-traditional and online education providers.

Influenced by rising costs and a post-pandemic economy, prospective students now view higher education through a lens of affordability and proximity instead of taking the long-term view of how a degree will boost their employability and economic status over a career that will last 40 years. As a result, institutions must now market themselves effectively while distinguishing their unique strengths, which brings us to the foundational pillars of sustainability: strategic planning, alignment, and stakeholder attunement.

Pillar 1: Holistic Strategic Planning for Sustainable Growth

A shift from episodic to continuous planning.

In a volatile environment, universities must move away from episodic, every-few-year planning cycles and adopt a continuous, responsive approach to strategic planning . This shift encourages institutional innovation and agility and allows institutions to regularly assess their situation and make timely adjustments.

A successful strategic plan looks far beyond immediate problems and defines the vision that extends years into the future, so we preach “start with the end in mind” for planning sessions with clients. This forward-looking approach anticipates changes in educational demands, labor markets, technology, and social expectations, positioning the institution to adapt to these shifts while building into the planning processes that review and update the plan based on external and internal environmental factors.

Key Components of Holistic Strategic Planning

Vision and Mission Development:   Higher education strategic planning must begin with articulating a clear mission that reflects their unique purpose and contributions to higher education. The vision should guide long-term goals, align with core values, and prioritize student outcomes, institutional impact, and social contribution. And two of the most important factors in an institution’s vision are that (1) it must be shared, and (2) it is measurable.

Data-Driven Decision-Making: Effective strategic planning in higher education requires comprehensive data collection and analysis . Data on the future environment in which the institution will be operating, student success, market demand, faculty performance, and financial health provide insight into strengths and areas requiring improvement. Institutions can make targeted, evidence-based adjustments as needed by using data to inform decisions – a dashboard approach to monitoring progress against plan.

Risk Planning: Risk (scenario) planning allows institutions to prepare for potential futures by exploring outcomes based on current trends and possible disruptions. This method of “what-if” analysis is crucial in a time of rapid change, helping institutions remain resilient and ready to pivot in response to unexpected challenges.

Integration of Financial Planning: Financial sustainability is foundational to any strategic plan. Budget allocations should support the institution’s long-term goals rather than favoring immediate operational needs. In this way, financial planning affirms strategic priorities, ensuring that resources are directed toward initiatives that advance the institution’s overarching goals.

Ongoing Feedback Loops: Continuous feedback and assessment loops are essential to any strategic planning model . By consistently reviewing outcomes, soliciting stakeholder input, and analyzing relevant data, institutions can refine their plans to stay relevant and effective.

Pillar 2: Alignment of Strategies, Structures, and Processes

For a strategic plan to be effective, it requires alignment across all areas of the institution – that is, the strategies, structures, processes, and people must all head in the same direction. Misalignment often results in disjointed efforts, wasted resources, and missed opportunities for improvement. Effective alignment ensures that all departments, from academic programs to administrative offices, work together to achieve shared goals.

Build an Integrated Approach for Holistic Strategic Planning

Cross-Departmental Collaboration: Institutions need to break down silos that separate academic and administrative departments. Creating cross-functional teams helps ensure that strategies are consistent, avoids duplication of efforts, and fosters a culture of collaboration. For instance, aligning enrollment management with academic advising and student support services can improve student retention and graduation rates.

In higher education, an institution generally focuses on improving one area, e.g., enrollment management, but fails to make changes to the areas that work with enrollment management. This limits the improvements that can be made. For example, Institution A struggles with enrollment and implements a new plan to improve enrollment by 15 %. However, Institution A did not improve their onboarding process or student services, and its new students drop out. Net result: the institution spent more money to improve its enrollments, but because those new students they enrolled dropped out, they lost money and became less financially sustainable. These types of systemic issues often signal the need for comprehensive academic realignment and organizational redesign to create lasting institutional change .

Curriculum and Market Relevance: Academic programs should be continuously evaluated and updated to align with industry trends and employer needs. Curriculum committees that include representatives from marketing, career services, and alumni relations can make curricula more relevant, marketable, and aligned with current demands.

But here’s the problem. Faculty are generally in charge of curricula, and they typically build curricula that align with their own areas of expertise – rarely do they take into account BLS data and other resources that would align with market demand. This frequently results in new programs that do not recoup the financial investment institutions put into them, e.g., new faculty, marketing, etc. When this happens, you end up with a white elephant program that ultimately will (should) be cut (or better yet, not implemented in the first place).

Clear Accountability and Responsibility:   For higher education strategic planning to succeed, institutions must establish clear responsibilities at each level. Accountability measures, such as defined performance metrics and regular progress reviews, ensure that each stakeholder knows their role in advancing the institution’s goals. This structured approach to institutional sustainability empowers faculty and staff while aligning individual contributions with strategic priorities. Regular monitoring of these accountability measures is crucial for the strategic planning framework to drive real transformation.

Implementation Roadmaps: A major challenge in higher education strategic planning is turning vision into action. Every strategic plan should have a detailed roadmap for implementing strategic initiatives to set timelines and allocate necessary resources and expected outcomes. This is where strategic planning transitions into strategic management – two distinct but complementary processes that institutions must understand to succeed. Institutions should develop these roadmaps to prevent strategic plans from becoming stagnant and ensure that each step has an actionable follow-through plan.

One of the biggest issues with institutions building a strategic plan is that it never gets looked at once it’s built – we call that the SPOTS syndrome (strategic plan on the top shelf… gathering dust). Or worse, institutions do not have a strategic plan at all. This latter is rarer in that (most) accreditors require a strategic plan, but because many institutional leaders believe that a strategic plan is useless because things change, they revert to the SPOTS syndrome.

If institutions make their strategic plans a “living, breathing document” that is updated regularly and guides actions, they will find that their results are far better than otherwise.

Utilizing Technology for Alignment: Digital dashboards and integrated management systems enable institutions to monitor real-time progress and ensure transparency. These tools can be especially useful for institutions with complex structures, as they offer an accessible way to track key performance indicators (KPIs) and measure success across different departments.

Many higher education boards are moving in the direction of dashboards. These are especially effective for higher education boards of trustees to monitor the institution. However, getting the right data, i.e., outcomes versus processes, is critical to ensure alignment and accountability.

Pillar 3: Engaging Stakeholders for a Shared Vision

An often overlooked component of strategic planning success is the need for a shared vision that resonates with all stakeholders. Effective engagement requires more than occasional consultation; it involves actively involving stakeholders in the planning and decision-making. This builds buy-in, reduces resistance to change, and fosters a sense of community.

Practical Strategies for Stakeholder Engagement

Inclusive Strategic Planning Processes: Universities can involve faculty, staff, students, alumni, and community partners in initial strategic discussions. Establishing advisory councils or focus groups for each stakeholder group provides a structured way to collect feedback and ideas. This collaborative approach allows stakeholders to see their input reflected in the final plan, increasing their commitment to its success.

In the “stakeholder input and attunement process” (SIP) , we involve key stakeholders from across and external to the institution in the planning process by getting their thoughts and input. This goes a long way in building a shared vision and mitigating resistance to change.

Feedback Integration: The SIP process, along with structured advisory committees and shared governance structures, provides opportunities for stakeholders to give the feedback crucial for continuous improvement and stakeholder satisfaction. Faculty, staff, and student surveys are a way to gauge how initiatives are perceived and where adjustments may be needed. Stakeholders should also be invited to share feedback on the implementation process, allowing the institution to make real-time improvements.

Transparent Communication Channels: Regular, transparent communication helps keep stakeholders informed of progress and invites ongoing input. Institutions can create newsletters, town hall meetings, and online portals to ensure everyone is aware of strategic developments, fostering a culture of trust and openness.

Celebrating Small Wins: Recognizing and celebrating milestones fosters a sense of progress and motivation among stakeholders. Institutions reinforce the shared vision and encourage continued commitment by publicly acknowledging accomplishments.

Addressing Common Barriers to Change for Successful Strategic Plan Implementation

Implementing change in higher education often encounters resistance, which may arise from a lack of clarity, fear of the unknown, or entrenched behaviors. To successfully implement strategic changes, institutions must overcome resistance to change by addressing three common barriers: people, processes, and structures.

Navigating Resistance to Change

Changing Mindsets: Resistance to change frequently stems from long-held beliefs or skepticism about the need for change and requires stakeholders to change their mindset about how to get to the future. This resistance is generally born of fear and suspicion, but by fostering a culture of openness and transparency, institutions can mitigate this. Leaders should also emphasize the benefits of change and how it aligns with individual roles.

Streamlining Processes: Outdated processes can hinder progress. Institutions should conduct a process audit to identify inefficiencies and redesign processes to support strategic goals. Streamlined processes help eliminate redundancies and align operations with the institution’s mission.

Reevaluating Structures: Traditional organizational structures, such as departmental silos, often limit flexibility. Implementing structures that encourage interdepartmental collaboration and accountability can improve responsiveness and help the institution adapt to changes.

Establishing Accountability to Drive Success

Accountability ensures that strategic initiatives are executed effectively and contribute to the institution’s goals. By linking accountability with each phase of the strategic plan, institutions can foster a results-oriented culture where individuals understand their roles in contributing to institutional success.

Clearly Define Responsibilities and Accountabilities: Clearly outline who is responsible for each aspect of the strategic plan, from setting goals to implementing actions. This transparency avoids ambiguity, streamlines execution, and ensures each phase has an accountable owner.

Schedule Regular Review Sessions: Monthly or quarterly review sessions allow leaders to track progress and address obstacles. These sessions can help identify areas where additional resources or support may be needed, ensuring the plan remains on track.

Define Outcome-Based Performance Metrics: Institutions should use outcome-based metrics tied to the strategic plan’s goals. For example, measuring retention rates and student satisfaction aligns with strategic goals related to student success. When metrics focus on outcomes rather than processes, institutions can make adjustments to stay aligned with desired results.

Foster a Culture of Accountability: Creating an environment where faculty, staff, and administrators feel accountable to institutional goals goes beyond formal metrics. Encouraging a culture where people take ownership of their work and its impact on the institution’s mission strengthens the overall strategic effort.

Building a Lasting Institutional Identity

An institution’s brand promise and identity are fundamental to attracting and retaining students, faculty, and partners. Developing a distinct institutional identity that resonates with prospective students and families can differentiate a university in an increasingly competitive marketplace. A strong identity also reinforces internal alignment, as it serves as a rallying point for staff, faculty, and students.

Positioning for Competitive Advantage: Higher education is becoming more competitive, and students often view institutions through a practical lens, considering factors like affordability, reputation, and job placement rates. Universities should assess their strengths, identify areas of distinction, and develop a clear value proposition that resonates with their target audience.

Aligning Brand with Mission: The institution’s mission should be reflected in its branding, student experience, and campus culture . Colleges can strengthen their brand’s impact and appeal by cultivating a consistent message that aligns with institutional goals.

Leveraging Alumni Success Stories: Alumni success is a powerful tool for promoting the institution’s impact. Highlighting alumni achievements can demonstrate the value of a degree and reinforce the institution’s brand promise to prospective students.

Pathways to a Sustainable Future in Higher Education

Building a sustainable future for higher education institutions requires them to be adaptable, strategic, and inclusive. Colleges and universities can address today’s challenges and thrive in a  VUCA (volatile, uncertain, complex, ambiguous) environment by embracing holistic planning, alignment, and stakeholder engagement. With clear goals, a distinct identity, and strong alignment across all areas, institutions can not only survive but excel, driving lasting positive impact for their students, communities, and society as a whole.

If you liked this article, you might also like Dr. McNaughton’s Strategic Planning and Management for Higher Ed Institutions Webinar →

Share This Post

Recent posts and podcasts:.

Washington Update: Implications of the 2024 Elections on Higher Ed — Part 2:: Changing Higher Ed® podcast 238 with host Dr. Drumm McNaughton and guest Tom Netting

Washington Update: Implications of the 2024 Elections on Higher Ed — Part 1: Changing Higher Ed® podcast 237 with host Dr. Drumm McNaughton and guest Tom Netting

College Merger Strategy: The High Cost of Waiting Too Long: When Timing a Higher Ed Merger, Procrastination and Hope Put Your Future at Risk

Subscribe to the change leader, get the latest higher ed news and expert insights from our articles, podcasts and newsletters..