hypothesis of rational expectations

• Search Search Please fill out this field.
• Macroeconomics

Rational Expectations Theory Definition and How It Works

What is rational expectations theory.

The rational expectations theory is a concept and modeling technique that is used widely in macroeconomics . The theory posits that individuals base their decisions on three primary factors: their human rationality, the information available to them, and their past experiences.

The theory suggests that people’s current expectations of the economy are, themselves, able to influence what the future state of the economy will become. This precept contrasts with the idea that government policy influences financial and economic decisions.

Key Takeaways

• The rational expectations theory posits that individuals base their decisions on human rationality, information available to them, and their past experiences.
• The rational expectations theory is a concept and theory used in macroeconomics.
• Economists use the rational expectations theory to explain anticipated economic factors, such as inflation rates and interest rates.
• The idea behind the rational expectations theory is that past outcomes influence future outcomes.
• The theory also believes that because people make decisions based on the available information at hand combined with their past experiences, most of the time their decisions will be correct.

Understanding Rational Expectations Theory

The rational expectations theory is the dominant assumption model used in business cycles and finance as a cornerstone of the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) . 

Economists often use the doctrine of rational expectations to explain anticipated inflation rates or any other economic state. For example, if past inflation rates were higher than expected, then people might consider this, along with other indicators, to mean that future inflation also might exceed expectations.

Using the idea of “expectations” in economic theory is not new. In the 1930s, the famous British economist, John Maynard Keynes assigned people’s expectations about the future—which he called “waves of optimism and pessimism”—a central role in determining the business cycle.

However, the actual theory of rational expectations was proposed by John F. Muth in his seminal paper, “Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements,” published in 1961 in the journal, Econometrica . Muth used the term to describe numerous scenarios in which an outcome depends partly on what people expect will happen. The theory did not catch on until the 1970s with Robert E. Lucas, Jr . and the neoclassical revolution in economics.

The Influence of Expectations and Outcomes

Expectations and outcomes influence each other . There is continual feedback flow from past outcomes to current expectations. In recurrent situations, the way the future unfolds from the past tends to be stable, and people adjust their forecasts to conform to this stable pattern.

This doctrine is motivated by the thinking that led Abraham Lincoln to assert, “You can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.”

From the perspective of rational expectations theory, Lincoln’s statement is on target: The theory does not deny that people often make forecasting errors , but it does suggest that errors will not recur persistently.

Because people make decisions based on the available information at hand combined with their past experiences, most of the time their decisions will be correct. If their decisions are correct, then the same expectations for the future will occur. If their decision was incorrect, then they will adjust their behavior based on past mistakes.

Rational Expectations Theory: Does It Work?

Economics relies heavily on models and theories, many of which are interrelated. For example, rational expectations have a critical relationship with another fundamental idea in economics: the concept of equilibrium . The validity of economic theories—do they work as they should in predicting future states?—is always arguable. An example of this is the ongoing debate about existing models’ failure to predict or untangle the causes of the 2007–2008 financial crisis.

Because myriad factors are involved in economic models, it is never a simple question of working or not working. Models are subjective approximations of reality that are designed to explain observed phenomena. A model’s predictions must be tempered by the randomness of the underlying data it seeks to explain, and the theories that drive its equations. 

When the Federal Reserve decided to use a quantitative easing program to help the economy through the 2008 financial crisis, it unwittingly set unattainable expectations for the country. The program reduced interest rates for more than seven years. Thus, true to theory, people began to believe that interest rates would remain low.

The Library of Economics and Liberty. " Rational Expectations ."

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. " The Crisis and the Policy Response ."

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, FRED. " Federal Funds Effective Rate ."

• Terms of Service
• Editorial Policy
• Privacy Policy
• Your Privacy Choices

• | 1st edition
• | Rational Expectations

The Efficient Markets Theory of Stock Prices

The permanent income theory of consumption, tax-smoothing models, expectational error models of the business cycle.

The benefits of inflation derive from the use of expansionary policy to trick economic agents into behaving in socially preferable ways even though their behavior is not in their own interest.... The gap between actual and expected inflation measures the extent of the trickery.... The optimal policy is not nearly as expansionary [inflationary] when expectations adjust rapidly, and most of the effect of an inflationary policy is dissipated in costly anticipated inflation.

Design of Macroeconomic Policies

Sargent, Thomas J. Rational Expectations and Inflation. 1986. Return to top

Efficient Capital Markets

New Classical Macroeconomics

Trade Every Market in One Place

Invest in stocks, cryptocurrencies, forex, commodities, indices and more

Bonuses of up to 100,000 MPH

Zero commissions

Margin trading with 10X leverage

Join the Morpher Newsletter

You are almost there, the rational expectations theory explained.

by Matthias Hossp

Article Contents

Understanding the Basics of Rational Expectations Theory

The assumptions of rational expectations theory, the implications of rational expectations theory, criticisms and controversies surrounding rational expectations theory, the application of rational expectations theory, faq – frequently asked questions.

As an expert in the field, I welcome you to this comprehensive guide on the Rational Expectations Theory. In this article, we will explore the basics, assumptions, implications, criticisms, controversies, and applications of this influential economic theory. So, let’s dive right in!

In order to grasp the Rational Expectations Theory, it is crucial to understand its definition and key concepts. Rational Expectations Theory posits that individuals make decisions based on the most accurate information available to them at the time. This implies that people have rational expectations about future events and use those expectations to make economic decisions.

One of the significant factors contributing to the development of this theory is the belief that people are forward-looking and can adapt quickly to new information. They incorporate this knowledge into their decision-making process, which in turn affects economic outcomes.

Definition and Key Concepts

The Rational Expectations Theory suggests that economic agents, such as consumers, investors, and producers, form expectations about future variables, such as prices, wages, and interest rates, in a way that is consistent with the available information. This consistency ensures that expectations are unbiased and, on average, accurately predicted.

Additionally, the theory assumes that individuals have rationality in their decision-making , meaning they maximize their utility or profits based on the information available to them. Furthermore, it posits that expectations are in equilibrium with the actual outcomes in the economy, meaning that individuals’ expectations are not systematically incorrect.

The Origin and Evolution of Rational Expectations Theory

The origins of Rational Expectations Theory can be traced back to the 1960s. Economists such as John F. Muth and Robert Lucas Jr. played significant roles in its development. Initially, the theory revolutionized the understanding of how expectations shape economic behavior by challenging the prevailing view that expectations were static and relied on outdated information.

Over time, the theory underwent various refinements, incorporating insights from behavioral economics and other related fields. This evolution allowed for a more nuanced understanding of how expectations influence decision-making and the overall functioning of the economy.

Central to the Rational Expectations Theory are several key assumptions that underpin its framework. One such assumption is the role of information in decision-making. According to this theory, individuals use all available information , including historical data, economic indicators, and other relevant factors, to form their expectations.

Another vital assumption is that markets are efficient and that prices adjust rapidly to new information. This assumption implies that expectations are based on accurate and up-to-date information, allowing individuals to make informed decisions about their economic choices.

The Role of Information in Decision Making

The Rational Expectations Theory emphasizes that economic actors have access to an extensive array of information that guides their decision-making. Whether it is through reading financial news articles, studying economic indicators, or keeping tabs on market trends, individuals actively seek information to form their expectations. By incorporating this information, they can anticipate changes in the economy and respond accordingly.

For instance, imagine a business owner considering an expansion. They would gather information about market conditions, demand trends, and future economic expectations to assess the viability of their plans. In doing so, they are applying the Rational Expectations Theory by incorporating information into their decision-making process.

Predictability and Market Efficiency

The Rational Expectations Theory assumes that markets are efficient, meaning that prices accurately reflect all available information. This efficient market hypothesis suggests that prices adjust quickly to new information , preventing individuals from profiting consistently from predictable patterns or deviations from rational expectations.

Market efficiency also implies that past trends and patterns may not persist indefinitely. For example, if investors expect a stock to increase in value based on historical trends, they will buy the stock, driving up its price. This rise in price will eventually reach a level where it accurately reflects the new information, preventing investors from consistently profiting from that particular pattern in the future.

The Rational Expectations Theory has far-reaching implications, influencing a wide range of economic and financial aspects. Two key areas where the theory significantly impacts are macroeconomic policy and financial markets.

Impact on Macroeconomic Policy

Rational Expectations Theory has reshaped the way policymakers approach macroeconomic management. It suggests that policymakers should take into account how individuals form expectations in their models. By incorporating rational expectations, policymakers can better understand the impact of their policy decisions and how they influence the behavior of economic agents.

For instance, if policymakers anticipate a future increase in inflation and announce a policy to counter it, individuals with rational expectations would incorporate this information into their decision-making. They may adjust their wage demands or investment decisions accordingly. Therefore, policymakers need to consider these expectations when designing and implementing macroeconomic policies.

Influence on Financial Markets

The Rational Expectations Theory also has significant implications for financial markets. Investors rely on expectations to make investment decisions, assess risk, and determine asset prices. If investors have rational expectations, then their expectations will already be factored into asset prices, making it difficult to consistently outperform the market by identifying mispriced assets.

Additionally, rational expectations imply that market participants will quickly adjust their positions based on new information. This adjustment process ensures that market prices remain informative and reflect the most accurate expectations of future economic conditions.

Despite its influence, Rational Expectations Theory has faced its fair share of criticisms and controversies. These criticisms highlight the limitations of the theory and point to alternative explanations that challenge its assumptions.

Limitations of the Theory

One significant limitation of the Rational Expectations Theory is that it assumes all individuals have access to and interpret information in the same way. In reality, people have different access to information and interpret it differently based on their background, education, and biases. This divergence in expectations can lead to market inefficiencies and unexpected outcomes.

Another limitation is that the theory assumes individuals are perfectly rational decision-makers. However, behavioral economists argue that individuals often deviate from rationality due to cognitive biases and emotional factors. These deviations can impact decision-making and challenge the assumptions upon which the Rational Expectations Theory is based.

Counterarguments and Alternative Theories

Counterarguments to Rational Expectations Theory propose alternative explanations that incorporate the complexities of human behavior and decision-making. These alternative theories argue that individuals may not always have rational expectations and may be influenced by factors such as bounded rationality, social norms, or psychological biases.

Behavioral economics, for example, explores how individuals’ behavior deviates from traditional economic models due to cognitive biases and heuristics. It suggests that individuals may make systematic errors when forming expectations, leading to deviations from rational expectations.

Beyond theoretical frameworks, Rational Expectations Theory finds practical applications in various fields, including economic forecasting and financial planning.

Role in Economic Forecasting

Economic forecasters often rely on Rational Expectations Theory to analyze and predict future economic trends. By taking into account how individuals form expectations, forecasters can factor in the influence of expectations on economic variables such as GDP growth, inflation rates, or interest rates.

As an economic forecaster myself, I have witnessed the power of Rational Expectations Theory in providing more accurate and insightful economic forecasts. By incorporating expectations, we can account for the influence of individuals’ decisions based on their rational expectations, ultimately leading to improved forecasting accuracy.

Use in Financial Planning and Investment Strategies

Investors and financial professionals also utilize Rational Expectations Theory to guide their investment strategies. By understanding how rational expectations shape asset prices and market dynamics, investors can make more informed investment decisions.

Personally, I recall a situation where my rational expectations helped me make a successful investment decision. By accurately assessing the information available and considering the expectations of market participants, I was able to identify an undervalued stock and make a profitable investment.

Q: What is the Rational Expectations Theory?

A: The Rational Expectations Theory posits that individuals make decisions based on the most accurate information available to them at the time. People have rational expectations about future events and use those expectations to make economic decisions.

Q: How does the Rational Expectations Theory affect macroeconomic policy?

A: Rational Expectations Theory suggests that policymakers should consider how individuals form expectations when designing and implementing macroeconomic policies. By incorporating rational expectations, policymakers can better understand the impact of their policy decisions on the behavior of economic agents.

Q: What are the limitations of the Rational Expectations Theory?

A: One limitation is that the theory assumes all individuals have access to and interpret information in the same way. Additionally, it assumes perfect rationality in decision-making, whereas behavioral economists argue that individuals often deviate from rationality due to cognitive biases.

Q: How is the Rational Expectations Theory used in economic forecasting?

A: Economic forecasters incorporate Rational Expectations Theory to analyze and predict future economic trends. By considering how individuals form expectations, forecasters can account for the influence of expectations on economic variables such as GDP growth, inflation rates, or interest rates.

Q: How can investors use the Rational Expectations Theory in their investment strategies?

A: Investors can utilize Rational Expectations Theory to guide their investment strategies by understanding how rational expectations shape asset prices and market dynamics. By analyzing expectations and considering them alongside other relevant factors, investors can make more informed investment decisions.

With this comprehensive guide, we have explored the Rational Expectations Theory from its basics and assumptions to its implications, criticisms, and real-world applications. As an expert in this field, I hope this article has provided you with a thorough understanding of this influential economic theory. Remember, incorporating rational expectations into your decision-making can lead to more informed choices and better outcomes.

As you’ve learned from this guide, incorporating rational expectations into your investment strategy is key to making informed decisions. Morpher.com aligns perfectly with this approach, offering a revolutionary trading platform that leverages blockchain technology to transform investing. With zero fees, infinite liquidity, fractional investing, short selling, and up to 10x leverage, Morpher empowers you to trade smarter across various asset classes. Experience a unique trading environment with the safety and control of a non-custodial wallet. Ready to elevate your trading game? Sign Up and Get Your Free Sign Up Bonus at Morpher today and join the future of investing.

Painless trading for everyone

Hundreds of markets all in one place - Apple, Bitcoin, Gold, Watches, NFTs, Sneakers and so much more.

Related Posts

Understanding Prospect Theory

Exploring the Random Walk Theory

Understanding the Loss Aversion Theory: A Comprehensive Guide

Complicated Aspects of Bitcoin Game Theory

Understanding Economic Depreciation: A Comprehensive Guide

The Concept of Asymmetric Information Economics

The PCE Deflator: How It Tracks Consumer Spending and Inflation

What Defines a Recession, and What are Its Implications for the Economy?

2024 Wheat Price Forecast: Expert Analysis & Forecast

Economics Resources

• Career Guides
• Interview Prep Guides
• Free Practice Tests
• Excel Cheatsheets

💡 Expert-Led Sessions 📊 Build Financial Models ⏳ 60+ Hours Learning

Rational Expectations

Publication Date :

22 Mar, 2023

Blog Author :

Harsh Katara

Edited by :

Ashish Kumar Srivastav

Reviewed by :

Dheeraj Vaidya, CFA, FRM

Table Of Contents

What is Rational Expectations?

The rational expectations theory is a macroeconomics concept widely used modeling technique. This theory states that most common people’s decisions are based on three key factors: past experiences, the information available to them, and their human rationality. Further, this theory shall advise that individuals’ current economic expectations affect what the economy’s future state shall become. Rational expectations theory assumes that people act rationally and based upon three factors: experience, current mindset, and the information available to them, that decide the economy's future. These are the future best guesses. This system ensures internal clarity in factors or systems with uncertainty. Moreover, the theory also places the impetus on outcomes not being too different in a systematic manner.

Table of contents

Rational expectations explained, implications, challenges of rational expectations, rational expectations vs. adaptive expectations, recommended articles.

• The rational expectations theory is a widely-used macroeconomic modeling technique stating that past experiences, available information, and rationality influence most people's decisions.
• Economic policies have implications on people's expectations, which can affect their behavior and subsequent outcomes.
• The effects of expansionary fiscal policies may differ depending on how individuals change their behavior in response to policy expectations.
• The rational expectations theory can help policymakers make better-informed decisions by considering how people's expectations may influence the outcome of economic policies.

Rational expectations states that individuals make decisions based on their understanding of human psychology, available data, and their experiences in the past. However, it is also made clear that individuals can be wrong about these outcomes. That is, these outcomes can be different than their expectations.

The rational expectations theory has some explanations and versions, which can be strong or weak.

• The " strong"  version theory and explanation assume that individuals can access all the available information and shall make rational decisions, and those will be based on that information.
• The " weak"  version theory assumes that individuals lack time to process all the relevant information, but they finalize or make decisions based on their knowledge, which would be limited.

Let us understand the rational expectations hypothesis in depth through the discussion below.

• The Theory of Cobweb is Not Valid Always i.e.; Prices Become More Volatile: For example, high supply leads to lower costs, and when supply is cut off, prices increase. And again, supply increases and this circle shall continue.
• Efficient Market Hypothesis: The stock market assumes that it captures all the relevant information while pricing it, including material nonpublic information.
• Permanent Income Hypothesis: Individuals judge whether the drop in their income level is permanent or temporary. They also consider future income and make consumption decisions based on that.

The implications of the rational expectations hypothesis can be different depending upon what people assume. However, let us understand common threads amidst these assumptions through the explanation below.

The implications of rational expectations can be different depending upon what people assume. For example, after the 2008 financial crisis, the Federal Reserve decided to use the quantitative easing program to revive the economy. Due to this, there was a reduction rate of interest for more than seven years, and the implication per theory is that individuals, began to perceive that interest rates shall remain low.

Like any other theory or hypothesis, the rational expectations theory is subject to its share of criticisms. Let us understand them to fully understand this concept.

• Present value bias states that the individual's current value on short-term income is more than income in a longer period.
• Most individuals are unaware of the impact of policies on the economy. For example, inflation impacts the economy.
• Most individuals do not learn from their past mistakes, i.e., if certain stocks performed well in the past, people keep buying them even though fundamentally it is no longer viable to purchase.
• A couple of economics theories suggest that people mostly act irrationally.
• Asset bubbles, for example, a recent hike in bitcoin values. Then, after a long ride, it started falling.

The rational expectations theory suggests that individuals act incorrectly at certain times. Then, on average, these individuals can be correct to learn from previous errors.

The economic policy also has implications due to the rational expectations theory. For example, the impact of fiscal policy, which is expansionary, shall not be the same if individuals change their behavior due to their expectations on the policy that is certain to have an outcome.

For a theory with such elaborate measures and methodologies, it is obvious to have challenges and hurdles to calculating it. Let us learn about them through the points below.

• It incorporates a lot of factors in decision-making.
• After considering all the relevant information, all people and individuals need to be rational and act upon it.
• People need to behave per the expectations of the policies placed by the government.

In a world where each individual has their set of expectations from situations, people, and other uncontrollable, it is inevitable that they might follow a certain checklist to ascertain them. These two types of expectations are often discussed together. However, their differences lie in their basics. Let us understand them through the discussion below.

The individuals using adaptive decision-makers use previous events and trends to predict future outcomes. At the same time, rational decision-making individuals shall use the best information available in the market to make the best decisions. It is also called backward-based thinking decision making.

In adaptive theory, people adapt to previous and past events. In rational expectations theory, people will not make decisions until they have gathered all relevant information.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

According to Robert Lucas, the idea of rational expectations is that individuals make decisions based on their future expectations. These expectations are formed using all available information, including past experiences and knowledge of economic policies. Rational expectations theory assumes that individuals are rational and forward-looking, meaning that they use all available information to make the best decisions possible.

In the New Keynesian model, rational expectations refer to individuals forming expectations about future economic conditions based on all available information and economic theory. This means that individuals use their knowledge of the economy and economic policies to form expectations about future inflation, output, and other economic variables. 

The assumptions of rational expectations theory include the assumptions of perfect foresight, which means that individuals have access to all available information and use it to form their expectations; rationality, which means that individuals make the best decisions possible given the available information; and consistency, which means that expectations are consistent with the underlying economic model. 

This article is a guide to what are Rational Expectations. Here we compare it with adaptive expectations, explain its examples, criticisms, and challenges. You can learn more about it from the following articles: -

• Expectations Theory
• Inflation Expectations
• Segmented Market Theory
• Stock Market Bubble

THE RATIONALITY OF RATIONAL EXPECTATIONS

The advent of rational expectations in econometric models has marked a revolution in economic thinking that is comparable in the magnitude of its impact on the economics profession to the Keynesian revolution of a half century ago. [6]

The Rational Expectations Hypothesis

Theoretical analysis, empirical analysis, bibliography.