Introduction: Researching Subcultures, Myth and Memory
- First Online: 31 July 2020
Cite this chapter
- Bart van der Steen 11 &
- Thierry P. F. Verburgh 12
Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in the History of Subcultures and Popular Music ((PSHSPM))
581 Accesses
2 Citations
The introduction takes as its starting point that an analysis of subcultural myths and myth-making can contribute valuable insights to subcultural studies. In the past decades, memory studies and the study of myths have gained prominence in the social sciences and humanities. Memory studies investigate the ways in which past and present phenomena are remembered, commemorated, and imagined. Myth studies examine the ways certain representations come to be shared as true or exceptional. As subcultural studies finds itself at a crossroads, with prominent scholars questioning the very existence of subcultures, these notions can open new avenues for research. For subcultures are not only built around shared passions and interests—either for music, politics, board games or anything else—but also around shared stories, imaginations, and memories.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save.
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
- Available as PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Available as EPUB and PDF
- Compact, lightweight edition
- Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
- Free shipping worldwide - see info
- Durable hardcover edition
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Similar content being viewed by others
Sufrimiento and Long-Term Ethnographic Engagement
Resuscitating the Subcultural Corpse: A Reflection on Subculture as Lived Experience and the Importance of Class and Ethnicity!
Introduction: Muslims, Trust and Multiculturalism
The relationship between youth subcultures and memory is among other discussed in: A. Bennett, ‘Popular Music, Cultural Memory and Everyday Aesthetics’ in E. de la Fuente and P. Murphy (eds.), Philosophical and Cultural Theories of Music (Leiden: Brill, 2010), 243–262; M.S. Gorbuleva, ‘Phenomenon of the Memory and its Role in the Marginal Subcultures’, Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin vol. 11 (2013), 188–193; C. Strong, Grunge: Music and Memory (London & New York: Routledge 2016); A. Danielsen, ‘Aesthetic Value, Cultural Significance and Canon Formation in Popular Music’, Studia musicologica Norvegica vol. 32 (2006), 55–72.
For critical discussions of myth studies, see W.G. Doty, Mythography: The Study of Myths (second edition; Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press, 2000); E. Csapo, Theories of Mythology (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 2005); R.A. Segal, Myth: A Very Short Introduction (second edition; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).
See for a case study: A. Medhurst, ‘Punk, Memory and Autobiography’ in R. Sabin, Punk Rock: So What? (London & New York: Routledge 1999), 219–231.
J. Patrick Williams, Subcultural Theory: Traditions and Concepts (New York: Polity Press, 2011); S. Blackman and M. Kempson (eds.), The Subcultural Imagination: Theory, Research and Reflexivity in Contemporary Youth Cultures (London: Routledge, 2018).
This process of elevation, also referred to as ‘sacralization’, is seen as one of the defining and distinctive characteristics of what makes a myth, and of what separates them from mere stereotypes or archetypes. See among others E. Durkheim, The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1915); M. Eliade, Patterns in Comparative Religion (London: Sheed and Ward, 1958); Ibid., Myths, Dreams and Mysteries (London: Fontana, 1968); G. Bouchard, Social Myths and Collective Imaginaries (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2017).
See for example: A. Bennett, ‘Subcultures or Neo-Tribes?: Rethinking the Relationship Between Youth, Style and Musical Taste’, Sociology vol. 33 (1999) no. 3, 599–617.
For discussions on subcultural research, see among other K. Gelder and S. Thornton (eds.), The Subcultures Reader (London: Routledge, 1997); S. Blackman, ‘Youth Subcultural Theory: A Critical Engagement with the Concept, its Origins and Politics, from the Chicago School to Postmodernism’, Journal of Youth Studies vol. 8 (2005) no. 1, 1–20; J.P. Williams, Subcultural Theory: Traditions and Concepts (Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2011).
Among the central CCCS texts are: S. Hall and T. Jefferson (eds.), Resistance Through Rituals: Youth Subcultures in Post-War Britain (London: Hutchinson, 1976); P. Cohen, Subcultural Conflict and Working Class Community . Working Papers in Cultural Studies 2 (Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 1972); D. Hebdige, Subculture: The Meaning of Style (London: Routledge, 1979).
For critical discussions, see among other: D. Harris, From Class Struggle to the Politics of Pleasure: The Effects of Gramscianism on Cultural Studies (London: Routledge, 1992); Bennett, ‘Subcultures or Neo-Tribes?’.
For important contributions and reflections on post-subcultural studies, see: R. Weinzierl and D. Muggleton, ‘What is “Post-subcultural Studies” Anyway?’ in D. Muggleton and R. Weinzierl (eds.) The Post-Subcultures Reader (Oxford: Berg, 2003), 3–23; S. Redhead, Subcultures to Clubcultures: An Introduction to Popular Cultural Studies (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997); R. Huq, Beyond Subculture: Pop, Youth and Identity in a Postcolonial World (London: Routledge, 2006).
D. Muggleton, Inside Subculture: The Postmodern Meaning of Style (Oxford: Berg, 2000).
T. Polhemus, ‘In the Supermarket of Style’ in S. Redhead (ed.), The Clubcultures Reader: Readings in Popular Cultural Studies (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997), 148–151.
Bennett, ‘Subcultures or Neo-Tribes?’.
J. Irwin, Scenes (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1977); See also: B. Green, ‘Whose Riot? Collective Memory of an Iconic Event in a Local Music Scene’, Journal of Sociology vol. 55 (2018) no. 1, 144–160; K. Spracklen, S. Henderson and D. Procter, ‘Imagining the Scene and the Memory of the F-Club: Talking About Lost Punk and Post-Punk Spaces in Leeds’, Punk and Post Punk vol. 5 (2016) no. 2, 147–162.
S. Redhead, The End-of-the-Century Party: Youth and Pop towards 2000 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1990), 25.
For studies on subcultures and memory, see among other: Bennett, ‘Popular Music, Cultural Memory and Everyday Aesthetics’; Green, ‘Whose Riot? Collective Memory of an Iconic Event in a Local Music Scene’; Strong, Grunge: Music and Memory ; L. Kube, ‘We Acted as Though We Were in a Movie: Memories of an East German Subculture’, German Politics and Society vol. 26 (2008) no. 2, 45–55.
For introductions to memory studies, see: A. Erll and A. Nünning (eds.), A Companion to Cultural Memory Studies. An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook (Berlin & New York: De Gruyter, 2008); J.K. Olick and J. Robbins, ‘Memory studies. From “Collective Memory” to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices’, Annual Review of Sociology vol. 24 (1998), 105–140.
M. Halbwachs, On Collective Memory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992); Ibid, The Collective Memory (New York: Harper & Row Colophon, 1980).
S. Sontag, Regarding the Pain of Others (New York: Picador, 2003), 76.
See Olick, Vinitzky-Seroussi and Levy for a defense of the original term: J.K. Olick, V. Vinitzky-Seroussi and D. Levy, ‘Introduction’ in J.K. Olick and J. Robbins (eds.), The Collective Memory Reader (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011), 3–62.
J. Assman and J. Czaplicka, ‘Collective Memory and Cultural Identity’, New German Critique vol. 65 (1995), 125–133, 132.
G. Bouchard, ‘Social Myths and Collective Imaginaries. Some Afterthoughts’, Philosophy and Public Issues vol. 8 (2018) no. 3, 2–15, 5.
As stated earlier, myth studies gained renewed attention as memory studies rose to prominence. For critical discussions on the relation between myth-making and history writing, see: P. Burke, ‘History, Myth, and Fiction’ in J. Rabasa, S. Masayuki Sato, E. Tortarolo, and D. Woolf (eds.), The Oxford History of Historical Writing , vol. 3, 1400–1800 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 261–281; L. Cruz and W. Frijhoff (eds.), Myth in History, History in Myth (Leiden: Brill, 2009); J. Mali, Mythistory: The Making of a Modern Historiography (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003).
G. Bouchard, Social Myths , 13.
G. Bouchard, ‘Social Myths: A New Approach’, Philosophy Study vol 6 (2016) no. 6, 356–366, 356.
See among other: E. Durkheim, Sociology and Philosophy , translated by D. F. Pocock (London: Cohen & West, 1953). (Originally published in 1924); I. Strenski, Malinowski and the Work of Myth (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992).
G.A. Fine and S. Kleinman, ‘Rethinking Subculture: An Interactionist Analysis’, American Journal of Sociology vol. 85 (1979) no. 1, 1–20.
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
Bart van der Steen
Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Thierry P. F. Verburgh
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Editor information
Editors and affiliations.
Thierry P.F. Verburgh
Rights and permissions
Reprints and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
van der Steen, B., Verburgh, T.P.F. (2020). Introduction: Researching Subcultures, Myth and Memory. In: van der Steen, B., Verburgh, T. (eds) Researching Subcultures, Myth and Memory. Palgrave Studies in the History of Subcultures and Popular Music. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41909-7_1
Download citation
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41909-7_1
Published : 31 July 2020
Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN : 978-3-030-41908-0
Online ISBN : 978-3-030-41909-7
eBook Packages : History History (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
- Find a journal
- Track your research
- For educators
- English (US)
- English (India)
- English (UK)
- Greek Alphabet
This problem has been solved!
You'll get a detailed solution that helps you learn core concepts.
Question: An in-depth case study of a culture or subculture is a ( n ) study.foreignethnicgendermatutational
A case study of a culture or subculture is called...
Not the question you’re looking for?
Post any question and get expert help quickly.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
An in depth case study of a culture or subculture is what type of study. Authoritative. Which parenting style is linked most closely with high levels of social competence and well being. Widespread immunizations. The reason a lot of diseases are now fairly rare in the western industrialized countries. About us.
Empirical studies of youth cultures and subcultures continue to flourish alongside active theoretical progression and debates within and across a variety of intellectual traditions. ... Subculture: Cultural histories and social practice. London: Routledge. ... Alt R. (2001). Youth cultures under authoritarian regimes: The case of the swings ...
cultural studies. Each reclaims the 1970s insights of CCCS scholars while heeding critiques made by post-subculture studies in the 1990s. Each also contributes powerful new data to the Chicago School's legacy of urban ethnography and deviance studies, returning symbolic interactionism to its roots without looking backward.
cultural knowledge-the concept of subculture has become vague and im- ... empirical approaches to the study of subcultures-case studies and survey research-provides adequate operationalizations of subcultural referent. The case-study approach involves the observation or in-depth interview of a particular group for an extended period of time. On ...
What type of study is an in-depth case study of a culture or subculture? Group of answer choices. acculturation. ethnic. enculturation. ethnographic. Here's the best way to solve it. - **Acculturation**: This refers to the process of... View the full answer. Previous question Next question.
Drawing from our in-depth case studies on films and documentaries, music, literature, contemporary art and their interconnectedness, we highlight the importance of socio-historical interrelations ...
Acknowledgments. Parts of this paper were first delivered at the Scenes, Subcultures and Tribes: Youth Cultures in the 21st Century Conference, Northampton University College, 2003. Some of the ideas in this paper are further developed in Blackman, S. (Citation 2004) Chilling Out: The Cultural Politics of Youth and Drug Policy, Open University Press.I would like to give special thanks to ...
The penultimate section of this volume presents two case studies that explicitly reflect on the practice of researching subcultural myths. Knud Andresen analyzes interviews with former West-German punks in order to analyze the convergences and tensions between the individual and cultural memory of a subculture.
Answer to An in-depth case study of a culture or subculture is. Your solution's ready to go! Enhanced with AI, our expert help has broken down your problem into an easy-to-learn solution you can count on.
Contemporary Cultural Studies from the 1970s, and a second, wider approach, which he named 'From the Manchester school for post-subculture studies'. In addition to these, he added the approach 'Back to subculture—the symbolic interactionist tradi - tion'. Subculture studies from last decade can be characterized by a debate over the